Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Adam H. Kerman" Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Cruz Destroys Gender Activist Judge During Hearing Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 17:29:03 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 272 Message-ID: References: <_qidnWbvU5joYdL7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> Injection-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 19:29:04 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b83f50571f8894859414094d29b93a5b"; logging-data="598077"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/Vr1JxYsl7eda+85I6c5Bffm05iujamxo=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:QAUE1R10umHBYKAGncObDYy+9zo= X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010) Bytes: 12441 BTR1701 wrote: >On Jun 10, 2024 at 4:21:06 AM PDT, "FPP" wrote: > >> On 6/8/24 9:48 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>> On Jun 7, 2024 at 5:51:24 AM PDT, "FPP" wrote: >>> >>>> On 6/4/24 5:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>> On Jun 4, 2024 at 8:25:10 AM PDT, "FPP" wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 6/3/24 10:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>> In article , FPP >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 6/3/24 2:22 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>> In article , FPP > >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 6/2/24 10:05 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> FPP wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/2/24 3:26 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So when you said you don't talk about another state's >governor because >>>>>>>>>>>>> he doesn't affect your life... that was... wait for >it... a lie. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> How does eating out affect my life? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Now, trying to destroy capitalism and education in the >country is >>>>>>>>>>>> another matter. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Your own words: another state's governor doesn't affect my life. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Weird how you're now claiming some governors have the power to >>>>>>>>>>> do exactly >>>>>>>>>>> that by "destroying capitalism and education" throughout >the entire >>>>>>>>>>> country by signing laws that only apply to their >respective states. How >>>>>>>>>>> does DeSantis signing an education bill that only >applies to Florida >>>>>>>>>>> affect your life, Effa? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Still no answer here. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> But for some reason when Newsom signs laws, according to >Effa the Hutt, >>>>>>>>>>> he only has the power to affect California, despite the fact >>>>>>>>>>> that in many >>>>>>>>>>> cases, he actually does affect the whole country with >his bullshit. Like >>>>>>>>>>> when he banned all gas-powered vehicles by 2035. That >affects the whole >>>>>>>>>>> country because California is such a large percentage of >the car market, >>>>>>>>>>> vehicle manufacturers conform their products to >California standards >>>>>>>>>>> regardless of where they'll eventually be sold. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Newsom went out to eat. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Newsom did exactly what Cruz did that gets your panties in >a twist: he >>>>>>>>> went on vacation while his state was in crisis. And he did >it twice. >>>>>>>>> Cruz only did it once. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> DeSantis is destroying a state. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Not your state. Doesn't affect your life. Your words. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nope. False equivalence. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Newsom owned up to it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Newsom never 'owned up' to fleeing the state for vacation. >Once he got >>>>>>> caught, he admitted his maskless indoor dining at the French >Laundry was >>>>>>> wrong. But he never gave a mea culpa for being on vacation >in Cabo while >>>>>>> he his state was on fire. >>>>>>> >>>>>> You guys caused the fires, ignoring climate change. >>>>> >>>>> To quote our newest Hutt: Nope. >>>>> >>>>> This nonsense that the California wildfires are due to 'climate >change' is >>>>> ridiculous. Even Emperor Newsom has admitted that historically >bad forest >>>>> management at both the federal and state level is a major factor in the >>>>> severity and frequency of the most recent wildfires. >>>>> >>>>> Anyone who thinks that if we'd all just installed more solar panels and >>>>> rode >>>>> our bikes to work, that the state wouldn't be on fire every year is >>>>> completely >>>>> delusional. And these idiotic media reporters and politicians who keep >>>>> saying >>>>> that the amount of acreage burned in California in 2019-- the worst fire >>>>> year >>>>> (2.2 million acres)-- is 'record-breaking' and 'unprecedented' are >>>>> bald-faced >>>>> liars. It's fucking factually completely untrue. >>>>> >>>>> Before the 1800s, California would see anywhere from 5 to 14 >million acres >>>>> burn EVERY YEAR. That's 12% of the state burning every year. >Before there >>>>> were >>>>> any SUVs or 'climate change'. Just as there were massive droughts in >>>>> California long before the era of 'climate change'. California had a >>>>> 500-year >>>>> drought between 800 and 1300 AD. These are documented scientific facts, >>>>> but >>>>> that undermines the Agenda, so we get flat-out lies from politicians >>>>> claiming >>>>> this is unprecedented, which goes completely unchallenged by their media >>>>> lackeys. >>>>> >>>>> Excess timber comes out of a forest in only one of two ways. It's either >>>>> carried out or it burns up. We used to carry it out. It was called >>>>> logging. >>>>> We >>>>> had healthy forests and a thriving timber economy. Then in the 70s, we >>>>> began >>>>> imposing a shit-ton of environmental laws-- both at the state >and federal >>>>> level-- that have made it all but impossible and wildly unprofitable to >>>>> carry >>>>> out that timber and what we've seen over those decades is increasingly >>>>> severe >>>>> forest fires. >>>>> >>>>> We've had an 80% decline in timber harvested out of California forests >>>>> since >>>>> 1980 and we've had 85% increase in acres destroyed by fire over >that same >>>>> period. The mismanagement has gotten to the point where you can tell the >>>>> boundary between private forestland that is not affected by >these laws and >>>>> the >>>>> public lands that are. The burn scars follow the property lines almost >>>>> exactly >>>>> in many cases. >>>>> >>>>> Wow, the climate sure is clever to only change over the public lands and >>>>> burn >>>>> them while leaving the private lands alone, isn't it? >>>>> >>>>> An untended forest will grow and grow until it chokes itself off. When >>>>> there >>>>> are too many trees for the land to support, they start dying >off, and that >>>>> dead timber becomes thousands of square miles of fuel, just >waiting to be >>>>> set >>>>> ablaze. California currently has four times the timber density that the >>>>> land >>>>> can support. Even the reliably leftist L.A. Times, which never misses an >>>>> opportunity to blame something bad on 'climate change', noted that >>>>> there are >>>>> currently more than 150 million dead trees in the Sierra Nevada, just >>>>> waiting >>>>> to be ignited. That's how nature manages a forest and if we don't want >>>>> half >>>>> the state on fire, we have to do something other than nature's way. >>>>> >>>>> That's why we started the Forest Service to begin with-- to >scientifically >>>>> manage the forests so that they're both preserved for people's >use and to >>>>> keep >>>>> them healthy and reduce fires to a minimum. And we had healthy >forests for >>>>> decades. But then the enviro-kooks came along and said "You're >interfering >>>>> with nature! Stop it!" and got all sorts of laws passed requiring a >>>>> hands-off >>>>> approach to forestry and now here we are, with the entire West Coast >>>>> frequently ablaze. ========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========