Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Joe Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,uk.d-i-y Subject: Re: OT: A lot better than a Covid death shot! Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 19:23:05 +0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 55 Message-ID: <20240307192305.7692d38d@jrenewsid.jretrading.com> References: <9fjjuid0i28o79c3nvlhuuao81ffqthv22@4ax.com> <7u3kui9vcmi4l0ddr18ecumdettjpntm8t@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="79d6921a21944f3e56e8933349042f11"; logging-data="1282147"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18xaMibsrxzMt6frRdSqbWJf5n266U9pao=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:zUYRW+R0IuU6fovHU9K65z7ROU4= X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 4.2.0 (GTK 3.24.41; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Bytes: 3485 On Thu, 07 Mar 2024 19:08:59 +0000 Cursitor Doom wrote: > On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 17:48:04 +0000, The Natural Philosopher > wrote: >=20 > >On 07/03/2024 15:15, GB wrote: =20 > >> On 07/03/2024 15:11, The Natural Philosopher wrote: =20 > >>> On 07/03/2024 15:05, Bill Sloman wrote: =20 > >>>> There's not a shred of evidence that Covid-19 was any kind of=20 > >>>> laboratory-developed virus, and virus labs are actually pretty > >>>> good at keeping dangerous viruses safely locked up. It's a > >>>> stupid idea, but Cursitor Doom and Jan Panteltje like it. =20 > >>> > >>> Actually its pretty much the main stream=C2=A0 consensus that the > >>> virus was cooked up in a lab, and escaped. > >>> =20 > >>=20 > >> Is that the consensus amongst people who really know what they are=20 > >> talking about? > >>=20 > >> =20 > >As far as I know, yes. > > > >https://oversight.house.gov/release/covid-origins-hearing-wrap-up-facts-= science-evidence-point-to-a-wuhan-lab-leak%EF%BF%BC/ > > > >is a fairly good overview. The problem is that accusing China of > >being uber sloppy was not politically *convenient*. So the default > >position initially was a 'we just dont know' > > > >Apparently now, we know a lot more... =20 >=20 > If they'd made it known that millions of people had died as a result > of a release of a Chinese bio-weapon, there would have been an > immediate clamor for a massive military response. Saying 'we don't > know' gives the West a bit of valuable breathing space to decide how > to deal with this emerging threat without triggering WW3. But I do > hope China will get it's come-uppance one fine day. They so fucking > deserve it. It wasn't just China... https://nypost.com/2021/10/21/nih-admits-us-funded-gain-of-function-in-wuha= n-despite-faucis-repeated-denials/ https://news.yahoo.com/nih-admits-funding-gain-function-125103852.html?gucc= ounter=3D1&guce_referrer=3DaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_si= g=3DAQAAACPGaZ5dUJFM3q5AfcrA5yai45fdGG3fYRStdwAE3MyFcIuuVbjhdODrC9uQ1A6LkPT= UjWl_y8le4SgMvvACZ5x16IR1_pOPgESFBYUgzj4cwPwtZk-heYt6_aG9uwn6DGb2nG0XNAx5Op= pmF3ArrFkja-d9TWqB8_U1lS1BLWYu --=20 Joe