Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Bill Sloman Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: Do you condemn Hamas? Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2024 17:35:07 +1000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 75 Message-ID: References: <6uq66jt7obko6psmti1llojs8g0102enb7@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2024 09:35:21 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9cc0063e46669b16b0a63547a86704b7"; logging-data="2654854"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+5TyhtYIeNTNwnTpRrUtikgnKOjHsf+lE=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:znpQCO8sIDVvQbMSo8MY9MLhcnw= X-Antivirus-Status: Clean In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 240607-6, 7/6/2024), Outbound message Bytes: 4457 On 8/06/2024 9:27 am, Cursitor Doom wrote: > On Fri, 07 Jun 2024 13:55:01 -0700, john larkin wrote: > >> On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 20:43:01 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom >> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 07 Jun 2024 13:22:40 -0700, john larkin wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 16:43:58 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Fri, 07 Jun 2024 07:49:17 -0700, john larkin wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 07:32:17 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 15:48:06 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 7/06/2024 7:27 am, NefeshBarYochai wrote: >>>>>>>>> This question became seemingly ubiquitous following October 7. As >>>>>>>>> Palestinians defied the imagination, breaking out of Gaza after >>>>>>>>> over a decade and a half of living under total air, land, and sea >>>>>>>>> blockade, many found themselves having to face this question. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Everybody sane condemns Hamas. Murdering some 1300 people at a >>>>>>>> music festival may be an ideological statement, but it's primarily >>>>>>>> a psychopathic act of attention-getting terrorism, and the people >>>>>>>> who planned it need to be locked up someplace where they can't do >>>>>>>> it again. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> An idiot who tries to justify it as a political gestures is a >>>>>>>> menace, >>>>>>>> and should be locked away on the same basis. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Bill Sloman, Sydney >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bill has a bit of a problem with anyone who disagrees with him. He >>>>>>> wants them all either jailed or executed. How typically neo-Liberal! >>>>>> >>>>>> I suppose there can be different opinions on the virtues of gang >>>>>> raping, >>>>>> hostage taking, and killing chidren. >>>>> >>>>> Wow, John. I never expected to see the day when you'd defend Bill >>>>> Sloman! >>>> >>>> Just by accident, he's sort of right once in a while. >>> >>> Like a busted clock you mean? Yeah, I guess... >> >> His motivations are emotional, not logical. I see that a lot, smart >> people doing very stupid things because their hormones dominate their >> neurons. > > That's the peculiar thing about the new Leftists, though. These people > call themselves "Liberals" but in truth they couldn't be farther away from > the original meaning of the word. Classical Liberals would be horrified at > the solution of executing or imprisoning someone who disagreed with them. > Not so the neo Liberals. It's a deeply disturbing new trend and it's not > confined solely to America. Not that Cursitor Doom can identify a single example of a "neo-liberal" acting that way, probably because the label is one that has has been invented by people who need a an imagined target to be rude about. -- Bill Sloman, Sydney -- This email has been checked for viruses by Norton antivirus software. www.norton.com