Path: local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 19:58:33 +0000 From: BTR1701 Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Oxford Music Professors: Sheet Music is White Supremacy References: <9kednTImBeTyi977nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com> <20240517214352.0000779c@example.com> <20240518200826.00006faf@example.com> <20240519162832.00005523@example.com> User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X) Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 13:08:09 -0700 Message-ID: Lines: 193 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-mQ3z9WbXEK9dCn7ZmVEgw8J6S3kRb9UnLIUmp4G/aNrUPIsQWnF2h9pV0i8BUpo59MERxV64yLREvT7!OkDsDdSNZXSXO/eo5IagoTNUmNeMD24NoQcN9s7PyRn6785TKQa8h3PDCubVvFJ9vEhCqOLGoCV2!WkQ= X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 11881 In article , moviePig wrote: > On 5/20/2024 2:28 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > > In article , moviePig > > wrote: > > > >> On 5/19/2024 7:30 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > >>> moviePig wrote: > >>>> On 5/19/2024 4:28 PM, Rhino wrote: > >>>>> On Sat, 18 May 2024 23:22:51 -0400 > >>>>> moviePig wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On 5/18/2024 8:08 PM, Rhino wrote: > >>>>>>> On Sat, 18 May 2024 19:15:05 -0400 > >>>>>>> moviePig wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 5/18/2024 4:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > >>>>>>>>> In article , > >>>>>>>>> moviePig wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On 5/18/2024 1:48 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> In article , > >>>>>>>>>>> moviePig wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/18/2024 12:09 AM, BTR1701 wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On May 17, 2024 at 6:43:52 PM PDT, "Rhino" > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 17 May 2024 00:42:52 -0700 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Horny Goat wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 May 2024 13:09:59 -0700, BTR1701 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, and because the current system isn't a dream for > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sight-readers, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that means it's a racist form of white supremacy. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Because only white people can sight read perfectly or > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something.) > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm pretty sure there were and are a few black > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> musicians who have managed the feat and somehow a lot of > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the concert pianists these days > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are of Asian origin... > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wouldn't expect that to continue if I were you. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> As I understand it, Asian musicians expressed concerns that > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> they weren't getting performance gigs as white musicians and > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> attributed this to race. To address that, all or most > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> auditions for orchestras started being done behind screens so > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that the judges could only hear the performance but not see > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the performer. But apparently Asians are now seen as white or > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> white allies and a certain group of people who I'll call > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> People of Darker Colour (PODC) are demanding that they simply > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be given positions on orchestras without auditioning because > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> they have been discriminated against in the past. I assume > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> they're proposing some kind of quota system but I'm not sure > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> what percentage of the slots they're demanding. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, I don't know if this proposal is finding any support > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> among the people who decide these things but, given the way > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> things are going in general, I would be surprised if this was > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> NOT done. Competence is going out of the window to be > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> replaced by hiring on the basis of skin colour. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm sure the usual suspects will be along momentarily to deny > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> all of this and/or defend it. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, during the height of the Saint Floyd of Fentanyl riots, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> where literally everything in America was discovered to be > >>>>>>>>>>>>> racist, there was an article in the New York Times that > >>>>>>>>>>>>> asserted that the blind audition system used by most > >>>>>>>>>>>>> professional orchestras and ensembles was racist because it > >>>>>>>>>>>>> *prevents* racial bias in the hiring process. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The 'problem' is that when musicians play behind a screen and > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the judges have no idea who the person is, what race they are, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> what gender they are, etc., it takes away the judge's ability > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to racially discriminate. This used to be considered a good > >>>>>>>>>>>>> thing, but in today's woke world, the inability to racially > >>>>>>>>>>>>> discriminate (i.e., give preference to blacks over whites) is > >>>>>>>>>>>>> a major problem that needs fixing. Blind auditions tend to > >>>>>>>>>>>>> result in orchestras being problematically white and Asian. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> When pure talent and ability are the only factors available > >>>>>>>>>>>>> upon which to base a decision, the resulting orchestras > >>>>>>>>>>>>> aren't 'diverse' enough for the intelligentsia. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> So now, rather than blind auditions, the wokesters want to > >>>>>>>>>>>>> remove that screen so the judges see the players, can actively > >>>>>>>>>>>>> discriminate against whites and Asians, and make hiring > >>>>>>>>>>>>> decisions based on race and gender, rather than ability to > >>>>>>>>>>>>> play the music. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Anyone who thinks a level playing field and the elimination of > >>>>>>>>>>>>> racial discrimination is the goal of the modern > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 'progressive'... well, I have a few bridges to sell them. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> And with all the hand-wringing over how they needed to get rid > >>>>>>>>>>>>> of blind auditions so that they can 'fix' the problem of too > >>>>>>>>>>>>> many white classical musicians, there strangely was no plan to > >>>>>>>>>>>>> 'fix' the problem of too many black basketball players (or any > >>>>>>>>>>>>> recognition that it even is a problem in the first place). > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Wonder why that is? > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> In so many words, you're complaining about 'affirmative action' > >>>>>>>>>>>> as though it were a moral absurdity. Does that sum up your > >>>>>>>>>>>> view? > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I'm complaining about making an orchestra less than world class > >>>>>>>>>>> so that you can pat yourself on the back for sticking it to > >>>>>>>>>>> whitey. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Yes. Giving someone a seat on stage for any other reason than > >>>>>>>>>>> that they can do the job is morally abhorrent. I'm not surprised > >>>>>>>>>>> you cheerlead for it. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Of course Asians are historically oppressed minorities, too, and > >>>>>>>>>>> they somehow manage to not only make it into these ensembles on > >>>>>>>>>>> sheer talent and merit alone, but dominate them. Weird how > >>>>>>>>>>> that's not seen as a 'diversity' success but a problem that > >>>>>>>>>>> needs 'fixing'. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> But the issue in question is 'affirmative action', i.e.: > >>>>>>>>>> procedural bias meant to hasten the homogenization of an > >>>>>>>>>> artificially bifurcate society. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> But in the case of these orchestras, there's nothing artificial > >>>>>>>>> about it. The auditions are blind and the chips fall where they > >>>>>>>>> may with regard to race, gender, and all the other grievance > >>>>>>>>> groups. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> A mostly white or Asian orchestra is no more of an artificial > >>>>>>>>> occurrence than is a mostly black basketball team. In both cases, > >>>>>>>>> the best people for the job are the ones who are hired. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Again, why is a mostly black basketball team perfectly fine, but a > >>>>>>>>> mostly Asian orchestra 'problematic'? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Both are historically oppressed minorities and both organizations > >>>>>>>>> are what they are because they hired the best people for the job. > >>>>>>>>> Why is one a 'diversity success' and the other a problem that > >>>>>>>>> needs to be fixed? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Any general policy is subject to second-guessing in any given > >>>>>>>> instance. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Which says absolutely nothing as is typical for you when you fail to > >>>>>>> defend the indefensible. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Let me help you out: The 'general policy' is to promote blacks, > >>>>>> disproportionately if necessary, into visible prominence in order to > >>>>>> change societal biases ...and even though every disproportionate such > >>>>>> instance will, taken in isolation, feel "unjust". > >>>>>> > >>>>> And when will there be enough black musicians in orchestras? > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Meanwhile, a pro basketball team is governed by money, not ideals. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Don't you think a pro basketball team would make MORE money if it > >>>>>>> had more white players? A considerable portion of their fans and > >>>>>>> viewers must be white and I would imagine more white players would > >>>>>>> be appreciated by white fans and viewers who would like to see > >>>>>>> themselves represented. If my reasoning is correct, the team owners > >>>>>>> are walking away from extra income by not having more white players > >>>>>>> - and more Asians as well, who might also be basketball fans. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Uh, no, not since Jackie Robinson. Today, teams make money by > >>>>>> winning. > >>>>>> > >>>>> But orchestras must prioritize hiring on the basis of skin colour even > >>>>> if it reduces the quality of the orchestra and therefore hurts ticket > >>>>> sales, right? > >>>> > >>>> Yes, competing priorities is a zero-sum game -- a mathematical fact. > >>>> And, anyone who sees no value to black faces in major orchestras won't > >>>> be pleased at that increased emphasis. ========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========