Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!news.szaf.org!inka.de!mips.inka.de!.POSTED.localhost!not-for-mail
From: Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.awk
Subject: Re: Operator precedence
Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 00:37:29 -0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <slrnv55129.2osd.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de>
References: <v2nium$1pl8f$1@dont-email.me> <20240523092856.646@kylheku.com>
 <87sey8movv.fsf@axel-reichert.de> <v2okuh$1vrvh$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2ouo9$2547f$1@dont-email.me> <20240523210755.307@kylheku.com>
 <87zfsektvi.fsf@axel-reichert.de> <v2tlbf$320cq$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2tn6n$32bqt$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 00:37:29 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: lorvorc.mips.inka.de; posting-host="localhost:::1";
	logging-data="91022"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@mips.inka.de"
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (FreeBSD)
Bytes: 1389
Lines: 10

On 2024-05-25, Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> wrote:

> People should be anyway aware of the operator precedences in the
> various programming languages since there are obviously yet worse
> definitions than the one we've been discussing here.

Which is why BSD has had an operator(7) man page about "C operator
precedence and order of evaluation" since 1990.

-- 
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber                          naddy@mips.inka.de