Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Bill Sloman Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: Challenger Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 15:06:49 +1000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 58 Message-ID: References: <5a5a6jtfh1je18lr297jrh10oihptl2tgo@4ax.com> <3ltb6j1v7miinkbhb0f3n6gknud5j9eeb8@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 07:06:56 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1236ab842aa8558cc41d140afb35f582"; logging-data="1589433"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/FQEbw+dUcaRCagJuE/yMfzqHku7q9ZvY=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:kep/OpCDh90eskMkloOxQynR0P0= X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 240611-2, 11/6/2024), Outbound message Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Bytes: 3524 On 12/06/2024 8:43 am, Cursitor Doom wrote: > On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 00:55:21 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote: > >> On 10/06/2024 8:05 am, Cursitor Doom wrote: >>> On Sun, 09 Jun 2024 11:47:50 -0700, john larkin wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 9 Jun 2024 17:29:13 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 09 Jun 2024 08:08:26 -0700, john larkin wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, 9 Jun 2024 08:21:52 +0100, Jeff Layman >>>>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 09/06/2024 03:42, john larkin wrote: >> >>> So about as reliable a statistic as their figures for historical CO2 in >>> the atmosphere, then. >> >> Not really. We've been observing the CO2 level in the atmosphere >> continuously since 1958 and Manua Loa wasn't NASA. >> >> The entirely independent Cape Grim observatory got going in 1976 - it's >> run by Australia's CSIRO >> >> https://capegrim.csiro.au/ >> >> and presents much the same story. It's southern hemisphere rather than >> northern hemisphere so that the annual fluctuation isn't as big. >> >> NASA estimate of how many shuttles' they'd lose were just that - they >> dated back to before they'd lost any. >> >> You objections to the thoroughly reliable climate data involve your >> demented conspiracy theory which has everybody involved in taking the >> published the measurements consistently lying to the public for more >> than sixty years. >> >> Nobody even thought that anyone would bother until around 1990, when >> global warming hit statistical significance, and the fossil carbon >> extraction industry woke up the threat to their long term cash flows. > > Sorry, Bill. I've got better things to do than get drawn into another of > your pointless pissing contests. Lying about the science evidence demonstrating that climate change is happening is a well-paid commercial activity. You aren't remotely good enough at it to get paid for it, but that doesn't seem to stop you hoping that you might. -- Bill Sloman, Sydney -- This email has been checked for viruses by Norton antivirus software. www.norton.com