Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.xs3.de!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: Ron Dean <rondean-noreply@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: West Virginia creationism
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 09:10:27 -0400
Organization: Public Usenet Newsgroup Access
Lines: 42
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <8v21O.28418$ocy9.24432@fx06.iad>
References: <ajsi3jdfqcr5095itvlrddnskb56h8ihd2@4ax.com>
 <CAh_N.50541$P_e7.43732@fx09.iad>
 <q8fj3j5pou54cmk3r73aeirgp4gi8im5qv@4ax.com>
 <UIB_N.97515$lwqa.97359@fx18.iad>
 <2e5n3j1u9a0pdcmpd4m78l2dssq3kns552@4ax.com>
 <c_P_N.74962$Y79f.10441@fx16.iad>
 <jron3j1cooa42dl583dk20gdkrrbl9062p@4ax.com>
 <csc%N.84268$Fmd1.77811@fx13.iad>
 <b0a6b3fd5d8e2f856b679be8a5abac97@www.novabbs.com>
 <QCv%N.3420$ba_5.1143@fx46.iad> <dm674j5g733v6jg3e12ptl45lm2rl74a5c@4ax.com>
 <MrT0O.21823$HJr3.16819@fx41.iad>
 <btr84jdf0bagrqqtpdma4tn8povbi440ul@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
	logging-data="40191"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 13.4; rv:91.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
In-Reply-To: <btr84jdf0bagrqqtpdma4tn8povbi440ul@4ax.com>
Bytes: 4206

Martin Harran wrote:
> On Tue, 14 May 2024 20:35:56 -0400, Ron Dean
> <rondean-noreply@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Martin Harran wrote:
>>> On Fri, 10 May 2024 16:40:15 -0400, Ron Dean
>>> <rondean-noreply@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Burkhard wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>> In fact, your opening gambit is directly expressed in the Bible: Judges
>>>>> 10:16 or Ecclesiastes 3:19: "For what happens to the children of man and
>>>>> what happens to the beasts is the same; as one dies, so dies the other.
>>>>> They all have the same breath"
>>>>>
>>>> I question that. But this is Old Testament which Christians turn to for
>>>> back ground,  but the Old Covenant contained in the Old Testament was
>>>> like a contract which was fulfilled by Jesus Christ and set aside. The
>>>> new Convent contained in the New Testament is the one Christians are under.
>>>
>>> I'm still waiting for you to explain how you get from a God twiddling
>>> with molecules and DNA to a God with whom we can have a personal
>>> relationship; the type of God defined in both the Old and New
>>> Testament; the same type of God defined by Stephen Meyer, one of the
>>> most prominent proponents of ID, in his book 'Return of the God
>>> Hypothesis'.
>>>
>> Not my call!
> 
> In other words, you can't. You appear to be in good company, none of
> the leading proponents of ID seem able to explain it either.
> 
There are no ID proponent on TO, that I see just me. Due in insults, 
castigation and character assassination, ID proponents are quick to 
leave TO. Except me,  so far I've been able to overlook it.
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>