Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!paganini.bofh.team!news.killfile.org!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop,talk.origins
Subject: Re: Ping:  FromTheRafters    (Was - Belief - I'd like to share this item with you.) (was: Belief - I'd like to share this item with you.)
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 10:59:15 -0400
Organization: Peripheral Visions
Lines: 57
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <uspqk6$bi3g$1@dont-email.me>
References: <l40megFm6p4U1@mid.individual.net> <l421m5FskvrU1@mid.individual.net> <55e145c3-aeb5-41b5-a97a-85825412748d@gmail.com> <urhs2h$2gi54$1@dont-email.me> <l499vkF1k6qU1@mid.individual.net> <l5b3iiF8hpbU1@mid.individual.net>
Reply-To: erratic.howard@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
	logging-data="43850"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:A8qgqnDwg+E5tZN0BAk0qQ/NWvk=
Bytes: 4183

dgb (David) expressed precisely :
> On 28 Feb 2024 at 17:48:36 GMT, "Dgb" <dgb@usenet.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On 26 Feb 2024 at 11:18:39 GMT, "FromTheRafters" <FTR@nomail.afraid.org>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> erik simpson formulated on Sunday :
>>>> On 2/25/24 3:44 PM, David B. wrote:
>>>>> On 25 Feb 2024 at 23:35:17 GMT, "erik simpson" <eastside.erik@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 2/25/24 3:24 PM, David B. wrote:
>>>>>>> On 25 Feb 2024 at 23:04:07 GMT, "erik simpson" 
>>>>>>> <eastside.erik@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 2/25/24 2:49 PM, David B. wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 25 Feb 2024 at 18:52:30 GMT, "erik simpson"
>>>>>>>>> <eastside.erik@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>     For the record, I think
>>>>>>>>>> Behe is pretty close to being a crank.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> What evidence do you have for reaching such a conclusion, Erik?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> TIA
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Senior Fellow at Discovery Institute says all you need to know.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I've not heard of the organisation before. I've read here:-
>>>>>>> https://www.discovery.org/about/
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> What do you feel is contentious?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The focus on Intellligent Design (ID).  This has been kicked around on
>>>>>> this group for many years, and has its proponents.  Obviously, I'm not
>>>>>> one of them.  I don't propose to re-argue this subject.  Check through
>>>>>> prior discussions here if you want to get the flavor of it.  I'm not
>>>>>> interested in getting involved in such a discussion.
>>>>> 
>>>>> OK. Thanks, Erik.
>>>>> 
>>>>> If you can point me to any specific past discussion, it will be much
>>>>> appreciated.
>>>>> 
>>>> I've deleted all but this year's discussions.  Go to Google Groups and you
>>>> can see everything except the most recent posts.  Posts by Peter Nyikos 
>>>> and the responses to his posts will discover the hottest discussions.
>>> 
>>> Does GG still archive NNTP articles?
>> 
>> Yes. Why come here to ask, Ray?
>
> *BUMP*!

What I meant was, does Google 'continue' to archive NNTP articles 
considering that they no longer peer.