Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeds.news.ox.ac.uk!news.ox.ac.uk!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.xcski.com!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail From: Ron Dean Newsgroups: talk.origins Subject: Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce! Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 18:34:37 -0400 Organization: Public Usenet Newsgroup Access Lines: 73 Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org Message-ID: <1gmNN.183646$hN14.153104@fx17.iad> References: <5vl2vilpidbokkqrd0v635aoudh42ql3u2@4ax.com> <0jenvil40oto62hmdksnpgj5ab3m2c0a6a@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89"; logging-data="68830"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 13.4; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.1 To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org Return-Path: X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org id D488722976C; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 18:31:03 -0400 (EDT) by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 943AB229758 for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 18:31:01 -0400 (EDT) by moderators.individual.net (Exim 4.97) for talk-origins@moderators.isc.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (envelope-from ) id 1rpyKe-00000001Esu-1cew; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 23:34:48 +0100 by nntpmail01.iad.omicronmedia.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D437E16ED for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 22:34:38 +0000 (UTC) id 5AF592280199; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 22:34:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Path: fx17.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail In-Reply-To: X-Original-Complaints-To: abuse@newsgroups-download.com X-NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 22:34:37 UTC Bytes: 6101 Martin Harran wrote: > On Thu, 28 Mar 2024 18:06:05 +0100, Athel Cornish-Bowden > wrote: > >> On 2024-03-28 16:52:50 +0000, Mark Isaak said: >> >>> On 3/26/24 10:29 AM, Ron Dean wrote: >>>> Mark Isaak wrote: >>>>> On 3/25/24 10:26 AM, Ron Dean wrote: >>>>>> Mark Isaak wrote: >>>>>>> On 3/23/24 4:31 PM, *Hemidactylus* wrote: >>>>>>>> Ron Dean wrote: >>>>>>>>> Mark Isaak wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [snip >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And what about people for whom theism is their greatest motivator, such >>>>>>>>>> as Obama bin Laden? Cynicism seems a rational response. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Are you suggesting that Obama bin Laden is typical of Islam? If so, >>>>>>>>> you're probably right. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> My apologies to Mark as I just Chez Watted this without realizing Mark had >>>>>>>> originally posted Osama bin Laden and in Ron Dean’s reply Mark’s spelling >>>>>>>> morphed to Obama bin Laden matching Ron Dean’s spelling. I wonder what that >>>>>>>> indicates about Ron Dean… >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Even without the typo, Ron's reply shows that he is grossly bigoted >>>>>>> against Arabs and Moslems. The typo suggests that Blacks and Democrats >>>>>>> may be added to the list. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Here you are so unfair.  It's easy to make accusations and charges >>>>>> without even attempting to support them. This in and of itself >>>>>> demonstrates your extreme bias and hatred of anyone with a >>>>>> point of view, opinion or belief different from yours. >>>>> >>>>> The support for your bigotry against Moslems is in your own post, and >>>>> that bigotry in turn is support for a suggestion of further bigotry. I >>>>> must admit that I had not considered the intervention of a >>>>> spell-checker. I have never known a spell-checker, uninvited, to alter >>>>> text that the user did not type himself. >>>>> >>>> I asked a question. "Are you suggesting that Osama bin Laden is typical >>>> of Islam? If so (if you confirmed) you are probably right". If you >>>> failed. I placed the burden on you! (Note here I defeated my >>>> spell-checker) >>> >>> Do you honestly not recognize the overt bigotry in what you just >>> repeated? It is really extremely gross and unforgivable. >> >> All the Muslims that I know (all highly educated women, at the moment) >> are perfectly decent people. All of them would be very insulted to be >> described as typical of Osama Ben Laden. None of them wear veils. A few >> years ago there was a student who did wear a veil, but that was only in >> her second when her husband came to join the institute. In her first >> year she didn't, and was perfectly happy to have her photo taken (by >> me) for a seminar series that my wife was organizing. She likewise had >> nothing in common with Osama Ben Laden. > > The problem is that bigots are generally unable to recognise their own > bigotry. When Ron Dean says that Osama bin Laden [1] is probably > typical of Islam, he simply doesn't realise how that shows his bigotry > towards Islam - I suspect that in his case, like most bigots IME, that > bigotry is based on total ignorance of the subject about which he is > bigoted. > I never said he is typical. I asked the question. > > [1] I'm assuming his changing of that to Obama was unintentional > though I could easily be convinced otherwise. > It was the spell checker. And me not checking after the spell-checker!