Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news1.tnib.de!feed.news.tnib.de!news.tnib.de!.POSTED.torres.zugschlus.de!not-for-mail From: Marc Haber Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: I never thought of this scenario Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 08:01:12 +0200 Organization: private site, see http://www.zugschlus.de/ for details Message-ID: References: <07WdnchvLrr2GI_7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2024 06:01:12 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: news1.tnib.de; posting-host="torres.zugschlus.de:81.169.166.32"; logging-data="654135"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@tnib.de" X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186 Bytes: 2007 Lines: 20 Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 00:40:12 -0500, Grant Taylor wrote: > >> On 4/12/24 22:26, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >> >>> The broadcast used in DHCP is 255.255.255.255, which is by definition >>> not routable. >> >> That's not the only (destination) address that DHCP uses. > >It can’t use any other, because remember, the client doesn’t have an >address that anybody can use, at this point. "This point" being the start of the protocol. You should look beyond the initial exchange. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Rhein-Neckar, DE | Beginning of Wisdom " | Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 6224 1600402