Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.szaf.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail From: Ron Dean Newsgroups: talk.origins Subject: Re: Wistar Symposium "Mathematical Challenge to Neo-Darwinism". Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 11:24:58 -0400 Organization: Public Usenet Newsgroup Access Lines: 26 Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89"; logging-data="13197"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 13.4; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2 To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org Return-Path: X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org id 6659B229871; Fri, 07 Jun 2024 11:25:07 -0400 (EDT) by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29D7D22986E for ; Fri, 07 Jun 2024 11:25:05 -0400 (EDT) by moderators.individual.net (Exim 4.97) for talk-origins@moderators.isc.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (envelope-from ) id 1sFbSp-00000003UeR-2WtU; Fri, 07 Jun 2024 17:25:11 +0200 by nntpmail01.iad.omicronmedia.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDFB7E136A for ; Fri, 7 Jun 2024 15:25:01 +0000 (UTC) id ADBAD1240203; Fri, 7 Jun 2024 15:25:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Path: fx46.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail In-Reply-To: X-Original-Complaints-To: abuse@newsgroups-download.com X-NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2024 15:24:59 UTC Bytes: 3205 jillery wrote: > On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 12:42:57 -0400, Ron Dean > wrote: > >>>> How many have you read pointing out the flaws >>>> in evolutionary theory? >>> >>> >>> The problem with that question is you and other cdesign proponentsists >>> have a very flawed concept of what qualifies as flaws in evolutionary >>> theory. >>> >> IOW - None! > > > IOW - when someone says "stasis is the exact opposite of gradual > change", it shows they have no idea what the words even mean, > nevermind what they're talking about, nevermind what the people they > quote are talking about. > Then please explain precisely what Gould meant by stasis and equilibrium. > > -- > To know less than we don't know is the nature of most knowledge >