Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connectionsPath: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: shawn Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2024-04-16 (Tuesday) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 16:21:13 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 39 Message-ID: References: <1364574923.735071829.906605.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 22:21:14 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f4542a5ef28613ce74da0af609217cc4"; logging-data="1891856"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+VCfP8Mqg3gKwCR1uJORqHKu0e+0mBHrA=" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:5d1P4F+t+RaTDOTW48cLMV2EtnI= Bytes: 2691 On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 12:40:36 -0700, "Ian J. Ball" wrote: >On 4/17/24 12:01 PM, shawn wrote: > >> On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:39:21 -0700, anim8rfsk >> wrote: >>> Ian J. Ball wrote: >>>> On 4/17/24 8:56 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote: >>>>> Dimensional Traveler wrote: >>>>> snipped text >>>>>> Although there were many opportunities in the screenplay, the Wilhelm >>>>>> Scream was not used in this film for a falling or injured character. >>>>> >>>>> Pretend you heard it from me when you mentioned the number of effects >>>>> shots. How many are there in a Jackie Chan movie fight scene? That would >>>>> be none whatsoever. What's the point in learning how to fight in so many >>>>> styles when it's just going to be a special effect? >>>>> >>>>> You almost tempted me. >>>> >>>> I thought it was just OK. >>>> >>>> IIRC, I was actually more engrossed by "Eternals", which may actually be >>>> slightly underrated by this point. >>> >>> No. No, it’s not. It’s a lousy movie is the best that can be said for it. >>> And a few are at all familiar with the source material. It’s a dreadful >>> movie. >> >> Agreed. I don't know how anyone can think the ETERNALS is anything >> other than bad. Sure, there were some interesting ideas behind the >> movie but it never came together. > >It's still more entertaining than "Shang-Chi". Congratulations on continuing to be wrong. ;)