Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: FPP Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: BIDEN: "Trump Won't Denounce Political Violence!" Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 20:23:10 -0400 Organization: Ph'nglui Mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah'nagl Fhtagn. Lines: 119 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: fredp1571@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 02:23:11 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f3a4ba9109587942726365dc4805081c"; logging-data="3448608"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19C/20eu52WXePWEltHS+XC" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:o4jGCy2AnZPNrUUijsksFMwH8ms= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 6446 On 4/19/24 2:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > On Apr 19, 2024 at 6:13:31 AM PDT, "FPP" wrote: > >> On 4/18/24 12:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>> In article , FPP >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 4/17/24 3:02 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>> In article , FPP >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 4/16/24 3:11 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>> In article , FPP >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 4/15/24 10:15 AM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Apr 15, 2024 at 1:34:00 AM PDT, "FPP" wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 4/14/24 2:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> In article , >>>>>>>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2024 at 6:15:20 PM PDT, FPP wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/9/24 12:46 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 2024 at 6:53:43 AM PDT, FPP >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/6/24 2:37 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> . . . >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And you still haven't explained why Biden hasn't denounced any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of them, since he's decreed that denouncing political violence >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is the duty of every president. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> [Fred Phelps citing headline] >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fact check: Joe Biden has condemned Antifa, violent protests >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wait, I thought Antifa didn't exist? Now you're claiming it does >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and that Biden has condemned them? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wow. Baby steps, I guess. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Or do they only exist to the extent you can win on Usenet today? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It exists as a concept, but not as an organization. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL! So it was a concept that was trying to burn down the federal >>>>>>>>>>>>> courthouse every night in Portland during the 2020 Summer of Love, >>>>>>>>>>>>> was it? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm so confused about Fred Phelps' position here. These large-scale >>>>>>>>>>>> protests that included violence, arson, and vandalism were organized >>>>>>>>>>>> through Twitter by people forwarding tweets. An "organization" is a >>>>>>>>>>>> body that organizes something. A protest was organized by those >>>>>>>>>>>> tweeting. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Of course Effa is full of it here. Even his fellow leftists recognize >>>>>>>>>>> Antifa as a thing, not just some ephemeral 'concept'. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> He acts like since they don't issue membership cards they're not a >>>>>>>>>>> group. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> fact that they worked in concert is what made them an organization, >>>>>>>>>>>> even without being organized as a corporation, partnership, or >>>>>>>>>>>> unincorporated society with charters and bylaws and other organic >>>>>>>>>>>> documents. Working together by passing the word along is what made >>>>>>>>>>>> them an organization. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It exists as a means of organizing among those doing the organizing. >>>>>>>>>>>> This is actual, not conceptual. Working together toward a common >>>>>>>>>>>> purpose is all that's necessary to be an organization. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Two dumbfucks don't make a right. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> From House.gov (who have slightly more credibility than two >>>>>>>>>> ignorant fucks bitching and whining on Usenet. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hahahahahahaha! Congress has credibility? Since when? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 1787. You know... that thing that you took an oath to protect and >>>>>>>> defend. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Congress didn't exist then. That's the Constitution you're talking >>>>>>> about, which is what I took an oath to defend. No one takes an oath to >>>>>>> defend Congress, jackass. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Constitution written in 1787. Ratified 1788. Met 1789. >>>>> >>>>> Which mean there was no Congress until at least 1789, not 1787 as you >>>>> claimed above. >>>>> >>>>> Any questions? >>>> >>>> All I mentioned was a date. I made no claim. >>> >>> I asked since when has Congress had any credibility and you gave me a >>> date in which Congress didn't even exist. >>> >>> Reading trouble? Again? >> >> Congress existed in the text of the Constitution. > > LOL! You come up with some funny shit when you're desperate for a win on > Usenet today, Effa, I'll give you that. Sure. Whatever. Can't read. Can't count. -- "Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC Bible 25B.G. https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0 Gracie, age 6. https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0