Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 03:40:43 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Kamala Outright Lies About Women's Basketball Brackets Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv References: <17d4370a814a9fe0$40$3919488$c2d58868@news.newsdemon.com> <17d484d04f3ee493$668$273357$d54a64@news.newsdemon.com> <_aB6O.6227$xPJ1.5613@fx09.iad> <17d4f219526ef751$751$273357$d54a64@news.newsdemon.com> <17d53aea33ae87ec$9480$2724781$4ad50060@news.newsdemon.com> Content-Language: en-US From: trotsky In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 124 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.hasname.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2024 08:40:43 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 6722 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17d5c07585baeedd$113115$3919488$c2d58868@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 7125 On 6/3/24 9:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > In article , FPP > wrote: > >> On 6/3/24 1:06 PM, shawn wrote: >>> On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 12:15:02 -0400, moviePig >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 6/3/2024 3:58 AM, trotsky wrote: >>>>> On 6/2/24 7:41 PM, FPP wrote: >>>>>> On 6/2/24 11:53 AM, trotsky wrote: >>>>>>> On 6/2/24 8:25 AM, FPP wrote: >>>>>>>> On 6/1/24 1:39 PM, trotsky wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 6/1/24 11:26 AM, moviePig wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/2024 4:43 AM, trotsky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 5/31/24 5:34 AM, FPP wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/31/24 4:16 AM, trotsky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/30/24 9:53 AM, FPP wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/30/24 4:31 AM, trotsky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/29/24 3:19 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamala Harris claimed that women's basketball wasn't even >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> allowed to have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> playoff brackets until 2022, when in reality, women's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> basketball has been >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using them since 1982, 42 years. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamala herself tweeted out exchanges with her husband in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2021 where they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> talked about who they were choosing in their brackets. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/yYjH5g9ogXE?t=409 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Between Biden's almost weekly made-up stories about his past >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Kamala >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gaslighting us about women's basketball, what the hell is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going on in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> White House? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What the hell is going on with Trump's impending conviction? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, and besides Trump who do you think makes the GOP look >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worse, Santos or McCarthy? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Harris owned up to the mistake, and explained it... but you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't hear that in Thanny's False Equivalency Gazette. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not a fan of hers but she is upstanding in that way.  The >>>>>>>>>>>>> GOP isn't upstanding in any way.  My biggest regret is that >>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump likely won't be sentenced to jail time. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Don't be too sure.  He's shown no remorse, and he did violate >>>>>>>>>>>> gag orders 10 or 11 times.  Those are big mitigating circumstances. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I could see him serving weekends as a punishment.  And even >>>>>>>>>>>> community service, which would absolutely humiliate him to death. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Fact is, he's going to get some form of punishment. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Judge Merchan is very cool.  It's hard to read how he'll react on >>>>>>>>>>> this one.  Your points are well taken though, he should be >>>>>>>>>>> sentence accordingly for those reasons.  I'm thinking he'll get >>>>>>>>>>> sentenced to home confinement with an ankle bracelet. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The choice of punishment could reasonably consider a convict's >>>>>>>>>> likelihood to re-offend.  Since Trump's conviction was ultimately >>>>>>>>>> about election interference, the judge might notice that Trump >>>>>>>>>> currently stands accused of at least two other instances of >>>>>>>>>> exactly that. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Is that your supposition or have you heard that somewhere else? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's all part of the calculation.  Trump is pushing his luck, and if >>>>>>>> he gets time, it'll all be because he's been asking for it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I could see him doing weekends in jail.  That wouldn't hurt his >>>>>>>> campaigning, and would teach him to shut his yap. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> To be fair anybody else in the world who acted as flagrantly as Trump >>>>>>> would be hung out to dry--why should the fat orange weasel get any >>>>>>> preferential treatment? >>>>>>> >>>>>> Because what the justice system gets away with in low profile cases >>>>>> they can't get away with here. >>>>>> >>>>>> They're bending over backwards to avoid even the appearance of not >>>>>> giving him every break possible. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sure, it's stupid... because they're going to do it anyway. >>>>> >>>>> That's why I think home confinement with a really large ankle bracelet >>>>> might be the choice > >>>> I wonder if they make bejewelled 24K ankle bracelets... >>>> >>> They don't really need any ankle bracelets since he's got the Secret >>> Service protection. Plus he's not likely to skip the country. Most >>> likely he would get home confinement to Mar-A-Largo which isn't really >>> home confinement. Other than his inability to travel to do rallys. >>> It's not like being confined to a 2 bedroom home. >>> >> Who says? You? >> >> Why aren't ankle bracelets needed? Is he special? Does the convict get >> to choose his jailers now? >> >> Why Mar-a-Lago? Why not Trump Tower? >> He committed the crime in New York. He was indicted and convicted in >> New York. Why shouldn't he serve his sentence in (wait for it) New York? >> >> Who gets to pick? The convict? Is this what your legal instincts tell you? >> Or are you just bullshitting in favor or your Dear Leader again? > > FYI- You're responding to Shawn-- who's generally sympathetic to Dems > and on your side-- not me, you dumb fucktard. Look at the attributions > from now on before going full froth. "shawn" came up with an especially stupid question/response so I can see how people would think it was you.