Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 03:39:57 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [OT] Professor inflitrates pro-Palestinian encampment; union leader calls for consequences Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv References: <20240505204412.000020d9@example.com> Content-Language: en-US From: trotsky In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 59 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 08:39:58 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 3426 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17cf4e3af79e0543$22471$310004$2d54864@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 3805 On 5/13/24 12:47 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > In article , > moviePig wrote: > >> On 5/12/2024 10:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>> In article , >>> moviePig wrote: >>> >>>> On 5/12/2024 7:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>> On May 12, 2024 at 3:54:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 5/12/2024 6:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>> In article , >>>>>>> moviePig wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 5/10/2024 1:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And now the Scarf Lady, Dr. Deborah Birx, says that thousands of >>>>>>>>> Americans could be injured from the mRNA Wuhan Flu shot and that >>>>>>>>> some groups should not have been forced to get the jab. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Weird how she wasn't saying that when Biden's decree was "take the >>>>>>>>> shot or you're fired" in the federal government. Back then, she >>>>>>>>> and your vaunted 'fact checkers' would only repeat the mantra that >>>>>>>>> it's 'safe and effective'. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You mean it *shouldn't* have been called safe and effective?... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ask the people who were injured from the jab whether they think the >>>>>>> government should have told them it was safe. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm asking what a responsible public health official ought to have said. >>>>> >>>>> How about the truth? >>>> >>>> The truth is that every medical procedure *including NO procedure* >>>> carries some risk. >>> >>> And an ethical medical professional explains the type and extent of that >>> risk, as well as its frequency of occurrence in the population. >>> >>> They don't ignore the risk and just tell you "it's safe and effective". >>> (And don't forget the denigration and censorship of anyone who suggested >>> otherwise, who have yet again turned out to be right in the end.) >> >> People who know there's always a small risk don't need to be told. And >> people who *don't* know it will grossly overreact when they *are* told. > > So once again, it's okay for the government to lie to us for our own > good. Yes, they probably even know who was behind JFK being shot even. >> So, the public at large heard "safe and effective", which, in context, >> the vaccine very much was. Meanwhile, one needn't support censorship to >> strongly disapprove of sensationalist life-threatening disinformation.