Path: local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 20:08:36 +0000 From: BTR1701 Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: [OT] Professor inflitrates pro-Palestinian encampment; union leader calls for consequences References: <20240505204412.000020d9@example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=fixed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Usenapp/0.92.2/l for MacOS Message-ID: Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 20:08:36 +0000 Lines: 104 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-mPUOB5vwx5IwMNMWQOZPUg6AgyD0kksvoCA83LqXEYxl+UqoEjHdql71hu1kmzFF2p92pMkALZlOvBL!kPW2eVblXArB5qrsogX8BvBHSakoxFsaqb9SzQEkgMWOFu2GRhB+FKbFSCkwIb9gUHc1bWOMS1B1 X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 5685 X-Original-Lines: 103 On May 13, 2024 at 7:52:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" wrote: > On 5/13/2024 7:30 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >> In article , >> moviePig wrote: >> >>> On 5/13/2024 6:33 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>> In article , >>>> moviePig wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 5/13/2024 4:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>> In article , >>>>>> moviePig wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 5/13/2024 1:47 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>> In article , >>>>>>>> moviePig wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 5/12/2024 10:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>>> In article , >>>>>>>>>> moviePig wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 5/12/2024 7:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On May 12, 2024 at 3:54:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/12/2024 6:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article , >>>>>>>>>>>>>> moviePig wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/10/2024 1:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And now the Scarf Lady, Dr. Deborah Birx, says that thousands >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Americans could be injured from the mRNA Wuhan Flu shot and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some groups should not have been forced to get the jab. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Weird how she wasn't saying that when Biden's decree was "take >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shot or you're fired" in the federal government. Back then, she >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and your vaunted 'fact checkers' would only repeat the mantra >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's 'safe and effective'. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You mean it *shouldn't* have been called safe and effective?... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ask the people who were injured from the jab whether they think >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> government should have told them it was safe. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm asking what a responsible public health official ought to have >>>>>>>>>>>>> said. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> How about the truth? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The truth is that every medical procedure *including NO procedure* >>>>>>>>>>> carries some risk. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> And an ethical medical professional explains the type and extent of >>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>> risk, as well as its frequency of occurrence in the population. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> They don't ignore the risk and just tell you "it's safe and >>>>>>>>>> effective". >>>>>>>>>> (And don't forget the denigration and censorship of anyone who >>>>>>>>>> suggested >>>>>>>>>> otherwise, who have yet again turned out to be right in the end.) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> People who know there's always a small risk don't need to be told. And >>>>>>>>> people who *don't* know it will grossly overreact when they *are* >>>>>>>>> told. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So once again, it's okay for the government to lie to us for our own >>>>>>>> good. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So, the public at large heard "safe and effective", which, in context, >>>>>>>>> the vaccine very much was. Meanwhile, one needn't support censorship >>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>> strongly disapprove of sensationalist life-threatening disinformation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Once again, real-world decisions appear simplest to those who don't have >>>>>>> to make them. But happily, in this instance, the vaccine *was* safe. >>>>>> >>>>>> Except for the people who were injured by it. >>>>> >>>>> This just in: Don't risk getting out of bed tomorrow... >>>> >>>> This just in: People have a right to know all the risks of drugs they're >>>> not just being asked to take, but ordered to take under threat of loss >>>> of their livelihood. >>> >>> I'll bet that *all* the risks of *any* vaccine will run to thousands of >>> words >> >> The government has the bandwidth. > > But the issue is that the public doesn't. Maybe this stand-up comedian could have used a little warning... https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1791410297246203904/vid/avc1/490x270/T-OXXSwrdDuplShU.mp4?tag=14