Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 12:51:28 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: NBC Historian Takes Media's "Bloodbath" Insanity To A Whole New Level Content-Language: en-US Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv References: <6NydnWwGgNc0xWf4nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com> <17bea7625eadf0f8$300665$2218499$46d50c60@news.newsdemon.com> From: moviePig In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 48 Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.hasname.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 16:51:30 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 2653 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17bed5b715bf3f58$7434$1098985$c8d58268@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 3069 On 3/21/2024 11:04 AM, FPP wrote: > On 3/20/24 10:42 PM, moviePig wrote: >> On 3/20/2024 7:54 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>> On Mar 20, 2024 at 3:15:33 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" >>> wrote: >>> >>>> BTR1701 wrote: >>>>> Mar 19, 2024 at 8:26:17 PM PDT, super70s >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> On 2024-03-20 02:46:53 +0000, BTR1701 said: >>>>>>> What if the cops held the door open for them. Is that still >>>>>>> unauthorized? >>>> >>>>>> Lie: The rioters were invited into the Capitol by police >>>> >>>>> There is clear video of the police holding the door open for people >>>>> who were >>>>> later found guilty of unauthorized entry. >>>> >>>>> How does that logically hold up? >>>> >>>> With that evidence, why wasn't the charge of unauthorized entry >>>> withdrawn or dismissed? Seems to me that both the prosecution and judge >>>> were obligated to do so. >>> >>> One would think. Obviously this only applies to a very small number >>> of people >>> who were there that day but for those to whom it did apply, it seems >>> that as a >>> matter of law one cannot be guilty of unauthorized entry if the >>> people in >>> charge of authorizing you let you in. >> >> Indeed.  Not if one remains in the area he was let into. > > > Jesus, pig... you don't believe that shit do you?  Judges and juries > sure didn't. > > https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/04/politics/fact-check-capitol-insurrection-january-6-lies/index.html I believe pretty much that whole article, including the admission that a couple of police might've allowed a couple of rioters in. But what I was addressing is the fact that allowing them into the building doesn't equate to allowing them into Pelosi's office to shit on her desk.