Path: ...!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 18:55:29 +0000 From: BTR1701 Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: 143 House Dems Approve Giving Illegals Voting Rights References: User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X) Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 12:04:46 -0700 Message-ID: Lines: 55 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-oOLppbCmsDEEBOerM7gjQOqPZS+xGhJRW/vIMgu/6C0AdBI+RYDURRvHncZL9yTCNQU0kMO7FuY+84p!Z/MMFP691LEcwSkz61jxMpezVJQh8QniS5qemFelnlGsbrfHWw+jHEWFgXJ+2j+t913YaJWL6msy!jOo= X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 3471 In article , "Adam H. Kerman" wrote: > BTR1701 wrote: > >FPP wrote: > >>5/26/24 4:20 AM, The Horny Goat wrote: > >>>Sat, 25 May 2024 09:41:51 -0400, FPP wrote: > > >>>>Another fucking lie. Nobody voted to allow any illegals to vote. > >>>>Since when are people wanting to become citizens equal to letting > >>>>illegals vote? > > >>>>This has always how we've allowed non-citizens to become citizens. > >>>>It's perfectly legal, and normal. > > >>>>Even your buddy, Rapey, presided over making immigrants naturalized > >>>>citizens. > > >>>The difference is of course that we're talking about ILLEGALS - not > >>>those who were admitted through the legal immigration system. > > >>>The latter have always been eligible at some point for naturalization > >>>(which is what's required to gain the vote) the former never have. > > >>>My late father was an American who became naturalized in Canada - he > >>>never voted before his naturalization, he always did afterwards at > >>>least until his final encounter with Alzheimers. > > >>Thanny was talking about Schumer. > >>Schumer didn't say the word "illegal". > > >No, Shit Shoes, this thread has nothing to do with Schumer. I'm talking > >about congressional Democrats voting to repeal a DC law that prohibits > >non-citizens from voting. > > Are you sure? I thought the DC law allowing non-citizens to vote and run > for local office had passed the DC council in 2022 and was in effect. As > far as I know, any immigrant would benefit from its provisions regardless > of green card status. > > The House voted to repeal the law. 210 Republicans plus 52 Democrats voted > "yes" to repeal the law; 143 Democrats voted "no", to sustain the law. You're right. I got it reversed. But the point remains. My comments here had nothing to do with Schumer. > >>He's lying about Democrats wanting to get illegals to vote. > > >If they don't want foreign nationals voting in our elections, why did > >143 Democrats vote to repeal a law that prohibits foreign nationals from > >voting in our elections? > > They voted "no", to sustain the law allowing non-citizens to vote and to > be eligible for local office.