Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 22:27:56 +0000 From: BTR1701 Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Man strikes back against Seaside California order with boat mural References: <20240513170449.000014ff@example.com> User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X) Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 15:36:54 -0700 Message-ID: Lines: 39 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-11KWPhDwnGEJo40U4KaJoGydblQfF7H7bC/KlJSCRl+T+Cag8DpQsoso91Vv8VBpQZoCX9rU5aXPjUE!sJHJ8DoMYH1kOVqAZm7aPp2LPmf6iOM8BZXQBtqEA+nPXWcpeU8siUlfj9CI9TJxtGD4+q8OkYot!v70= X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 2662 In article , moviePig wrote: > On 5/13/2024 5:04 PM, Rhino wrote: > > On Mon, 13 May 2024 20:49:19 -0000 (UTC) > > "Adam H. Kerman" wrote: > > > >> I'm guessing that Seaside California is on the ocean and lots of > >> residents own boats? > >> > >> A man had his boat on his property. He was told that municipal code > >> required him to install a 6 foot tall fence around it to comply with > >> code. > >> > >> He built the fence then painted a realistic mural of a boat on the > >> fence. > >> > >> Man strikes back against Seaside order with boat mural > >> by Torstein Rehn > >> KSBW-TV News Channel 8 > >> Updated: 1:22 PM PDT May 13, 2024 > >> https://www.ksbw.com/article/man-strikes-back-against-seaside-order-with-bo > >> at-mural/60749038 > > > > I didn't see anything in the article explaining WHY he had to have a > > fence around his boat. Is this a case of "Because we said so!" or is > > there a sensible reason for the policy? > > > > As for the fence he built, it's brilliant! We should all do that when > > faced with unjust laws and rules: either fight them (if we can) or mock > > them. > > A mural of a boat is likely less of an eyesore than an actual boat. And > if somehow it weren't, it probably runs afoul of other community codes. But community codes are subordinate to the 1st Amendment. A boat isn't speech but a mural of a boat *is* speech and community codes will have to do a lot of heavy lifting to overcome the law's heavy presumption in favor of protecting speech.