Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 18:59:00 +0000 Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 11:59:00 -0700 From: Pluted Pup Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Hogwasher/5.24 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <0001HW.2C03BDF4032DB24330E57938F@news.giganews.com> Subject: Re: The Unprotected Class: How Anti-White Racism is Tearing America Apart Newsgroups: rec.sport.tennis, rec.arts.tv, uk.comp.sys.mac, edm.general, sci.electronics.design References: <0001HW.2C03BD0B032D7BBD30E57938F@news.giganews.com> Lines: 100 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-ztHWyUGWwgBwRDd9VhxGwrwBjjad23gwyF6jOKS9FZELxo15uwvTetwTvK8SsRHoBNkKhqMc6zkLECR!yhiF1fb0/65+U5ShpvId2ANv+vxDzHxI42+1+evj3Ak/5PmZxCl5uw4ITfXTMo5tlDUgrrpwVZdV!evQ0 X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 6382 On Sun, 26 May 2024 11:55:07 -0700, Pluted Pup wrote: > On Fri, 24 May 2024 13:29:13 -0700, NefeshBarYochai wrote: > > > https://www.amren.com/features/2024/05/the-respectable-right-discovers-anti-white-hostility/ > > > > Conclusion > > > > As Mr. Carl writes, white Americans today "suffer from downward > > economic mobility, declining fertility, rising drug addiction and > > depression, and narrowing opportunities, all piled onto a false > > presumption of privilege." Any vestigial advantages they may still > > derive from belonging to Americaīs historical majority are "informal > > and evanescent cultural legacies," whereas "the discrimination they > > experience is . . . increasingly legal and formal." > > > > Obviously, if there were any real "white privilege," non-whites would > > be trying to "pass" for white (as they once did). Instead, we see a > > flight from white. The reported American Indian population ballooned > > from 0.4 percent in 1970 to nearly 3 percent in 2020, not due to any > > explosion in fertility but to an increase in Elizabeth Warren-style > > claims aimed at getting non-white privilege. > > > > Mr. Carl acknowledges that whites are not merely the victims of > > anti-white hostility, but often its most enthusiastic perpetrators. He > > combines a defense of whites as a group with harsh criticism of these > > white progressives, writing that their "moral mania has made them, > > without question, the most destructive group in American life. No real > > solution to our racial problems is possible until they either reject > > their current anti-white animus or are removed from their positions of > > power and authority." > > > > The endgame of the current system is "the expropriation of land, > > property, and other wealth from whites" and the institution of "a > > permanent regime of anti-white employment and legal discrimination." > > As of now, he writes, "appeals to expropriation are usually indirect," > > but over time they "will become more direct and in need of less > > justification as the political power of white Americans continues to > > decline." > > > > Two developments make this clear. The first is the growing success of > > the reparations movement: > > > > Black reparations will open the door to massive multi-trillion-dollar > > payments to any group that can seize the holy grail of victimhood. We > > arenīt going to win this fight by nibbling around the edges, by > > compromising, or by saying that groups deserve reparations for this > > but not for that. We must pull up root and branch the entire concept > > of mass racial reparations. > > > > The alternative is likely to be "racial extortion on an unimaginable > > scale," possibly leading to "interethnic violence and a collapse of > > American society." > > > > The second recent development is a practice imported from Canada: land > > acknowledgements. It is no common for institutions built by whites to > > "acknowledge" that they are on land taken from this or that tribe. As > > the author points out, the entire practice is intellectually > > incoherent, since the particular group whose lands whites occupied > > were seldom or never the first group to hold them. An honest land > > acknowledgement might sound something like: "Our ancestors took this > > land from the Chippewa, who had previously driven out the Sioux to > > another place where they would go on to massacre the Pawnee," etc., > > etc. More importantly, such "acknowledgements" are "an intellectual > > precursor to expropriation," and deserve to be taken seriously as > > such. > > > > Mr. Carl reports that some readers of early drafts of The Unprotected > > Class were enthusiastic about his ideas but felt that "a non-white > > ought to write such a book instead of him." > > > > Somehow a white person advancing arguments that white people should be > > treated fairly was seen as unseemly. Itīs an understandable political > > instinct for anyone who has been involved in American politics in > > recent decades, but ultimately itīs an attitude we need to eliminate. > > > > It is whitesī failure to organize in defense of our own interests that > > had made the anti-white regime possible. As Mr. Carl writes, > > "non-whites have organized and made powerful demands, while whites > > have focused on broad, gauzy appeals to . . . universal rights" that > > have proven "almost completely ineffective." It is time for us to make > > strong demands. > > > > As noted, we have looked here at only a few of the twelve realms of > > anti-white discrimination Mr. Carl discusses. The reader should get > > the book itself for the full story. I am unaware of any mainstream > > book on race published since American Renaissance was founded 34 years > > ago that pulls so few punches. > > > > The Unprotected Class: How Anti-White Racism is Tearing America > > Apart, Regnery Publishing, 2024, 369+xviii pages, > > 'doesn't pull punches'? > > Where does it cover Jew against White? I ordered the book anyway. What's with another book that I disagree with?