Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Adam H. Kerman" Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Inconvenient lefties Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2024 23:32:06 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: Injection-Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2024 23:32:07 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8b35f3a82528bad77260edde5fd5a277"; logging-data="2493489"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18ppvSokd7EkiduKJGdt2LeZBOD3yxNLI8=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:2O9/5blsfNLg1WJ8NV1S2cVnhUs= X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010) Bytes: 1533 BTR1701 wrote: >Who's banning words and policing the language? >https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1776348840171347968/vid/avc1/482x270/7c-0yRyX-G2NI4o-.mp4?tag=14 >CT State Senator Martha Marx (D) says only using the term "pregnant mother" is >going down a "slippery slope" because then we also have to include "pregnant >father". >She proposes the government only use the term "pregnant person" because it's >most inclusive and covers "every person that will show up with a baby in their >womb". I refuse to say it unless Ah'nold makes a case for it.