Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: FPP Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Cruz Destroys Gender Activist Judge During Hearing Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 08:51:24 -0400 Organization: Ph'nglui Mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah'nagl Fhtagn. Lines: 169 Message-ID: References: <_qidnWbvU5joYdL7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> Reply-To: fredp1571@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2024 14:51:28 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e3920458a2d30a66f26cb3726f5e6f16"; logging-data="2191296"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+zudemcWDQrnLFx4d7wiRl" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:+WNkBjnEkkxGYlcNIhfJ5QnrdYg= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 10686 On 6/4/24 5:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > On Jun 4, 2024 at 8:25:10 AM PDT, "FPP" wrote: > >> On 6/3/24 10:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>> In article , FPP >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 6/3/24 2:22 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>> In article , FPP >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 6/2/24 10:05 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>> FPP wrote: >>>>>>>> On 6/2/24 3:26 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>> So when you said you don't talk about another state's governor because >>>>>>>>> he doesn't affect your life... that was... wait for it... a lie. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> How does eating out affect my life? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Now, trying to destroy capitalism and education in the country is >>>>>>>> another matter. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Your own words: another state's governor doesn't affect my life. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Weird how you're now claiming some governors have the power to do exactly >>>>>>> that by "destroying capitalism and education" throughout the entire >>>>>>> country by signing laws that only apply to their respective states. How >>>>>>> does DeSantis signing an education bill that only applies to Florida >>>>>>> affect your life, Effa? >>> >>> Still no answer here. >>> >>>>>>> But for some reason when Newsom signs laws, according to Effa the Hutt, >>>>>>> he only has the power to affect California, despite the fact that in many >>>>>>> cases, he actually does affect the whole country with his bullshit. Like >>>>>>> when he banned all gas-powered vehicles by 2035. That affects the whole >>>>>>> country because California is such a large percentage of the car market, >>>>>>> vehicle manufacturers conform their products to California standards >>>>>>> regardless of where they'll eventually be sold. >>>>> >>>>>> Newsom went out to eat. >>>>> >>>>> Newsom did exactly what Cruz did that gets your panties in a twist: he >>>>> went on vacation while his state was in crisis. And he did it twice. >>>>> Cruz only did it once. >>>>> >>>>>> DeSantis is destroying a state. >>>>> >>>>> Not your state. Doesn't affect your life. Your words. >>> >>>> Nope. False equivalence. >>>> >>>> Newsom owned up to it. >>> >>> Newsom never 'owned up' to fleeing the state for vacation. Once he got >>> caught, he admitted his maskless indoor dining at the French Laundry was >>> wrong. But he never gave a mea culpa for being on vacation in Cabo while >>> he his state was on fire. >>> >> You guys caused the fires, ignoring climate change. > > To quote our newest Hutt: Nope. > > This nonsense that the California wildfires are due to 'climate change' is > ridiculous. Even Emperor Newsom has admitted that historically bad forest > management at both the federal and state level is a major factor in the > severity and frequency of the most recent wildfires. > > Anyone who thinks that if we'd all just installed more solar panels and rode > our bikes to work, that the state wouldn't be on fire every year is completely > delusional. And these idiotic media reporters and politicians who keep saying > that the amount of acreage burned in California in 2019-- the worst fire year > (2.2 million acres)-- is 'record-breaking' and 'unprecedented' are bald-faced > liars. It's fucking factually completely untrue. > > Before the 1800s, California would see anywhere from 5 to 14 million acres > burn EVERY YEAR. That's 12% of the state burning every year. Before there were > any SUVs or 'climate change'. Just as there were massive droughts in > California long before the era of 'climate change'. California had a 500-year > drought between 800 and 1300 AD. These are documented scientific facts, but > that undermines the Agenda, so we get flat-out lies from politicians claiming > this is unprecedented, which goes completely unchallenged by their media > lackeys. > > Excess timber comes out of a forest in only one of two ways. It's either > carried out or it burns up. We used to carry it out. It was called logging. We > had healthy forests and a thriving timber economy. Then in the 70s, we began > imposing a shit-ton of environmental laws-- both at the state and federal > level-- that have made it all but impossible and wildly unprofitable to carry > out that timber and what we've seen over those decades is increasingly severe > forest fires. > > We've had an 80% decline in timber harvested out of California forests since > 1980 and we've had 85% increase in acres destroyed by fire over that same > period. The mismanagement has gotten to the point where you can tell the > boundary between private forestland that is not affected by these laws and the > public lands that are. The burn scars follow the property lines almost exactly > in many cases. > > Wow, the climate sure is clever to only change over the public lands and burn > them while leaving the private lands alone, isn't it? > > An untended forest will grow and grow until it chokes itself off. When there > are too many trees for the land to support, they start dying off, and that > dead timber becomes thousands of square miles of fuel, just waiting to be set > ablaze. California currently has four times the timber density that the land > can support. Even the reliably leftist L.A. Times, which never misses an > opportunity to blame something bad on 'climate change', noted that there are > currently more than 150 million dead trees in the Sierra Nevada, just waiting > to be ignited. That's how nature manages a forest and if we don't want half > the state on fire, we have to do something other than nature's way. > > That's why we started the Forest Service to begin with-- to scientifically > manage the forests so that they're both preserved for people's use and to keep > them healthy and reduce fires to a minimum. And we had healthy forests for > decades. But then the enviro-kooks came along and said "You're interfering > with nature! Stop it!" and got all sorts of laws passed requiring a hands-off > approach to forestry and now here we are, with the entire West Coast > frequently ablaze. > > The Native American tribes understood this and would routinely both clear away > dead trees and brush from around their settlements and villages and conduct > controlled burns to reduce the possibility of large out-of-control fires. Then > came the white environmentalists, who dismissed the practices of those they > considered ignorant savages, and decided they knew better how to do things. > Well, we're seeing how well that worked out, huh? > > But no, we're still having to deal with idiots like Pelosi, Newsom, > Occasional-Cortex, and Karen Bass who insist that this problem can be solved > with carbon caps and solar panels and windmills, when the truth is that if the > U.S. literally shut down all emissions COMPLETELY-- cars, gone; industry, > gone; cattle farming, gone; airplanes, gone; all of it, gone-- and we lived > that way for the next 80 years, it would only reduce the global mean > temperature by 0.3 degrees. That's from the U.N. IPCC model itself. You can go > run the numbers yourself if you don't believe it. > > These wildfires are not a 'climate change' problem. They're a forest > management problem. Period. > > What a fucking piece of shit you are. Talking to you is like talking to Trump, just without the warmth. You talk a big game, but I'm quoting NOAA. > NEWS & EVENTS > Study Finds Climate Change to Blame For Record-Breaking California Wildfires > Published onAugust 8, 2023 > In a new NIDIS-funded study in Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, an international group of researchers created a climate-driven model of summer burned area evolution in California and combined it with natural and historical climate simulations to assess the importance of human-caused climate change on increased burned areas. > > It was found that nearly all the observed increase in burned areas over the past half-century is due to human-caused climate change. It is estimated that from 1971 to 2021, human-caused climate change contributed to a +172% increase in burned areas, with a +320% increase from 1996 to 2021. In the coming decades, a further increase in annual forest burned areas is expected, ranging from 3% to 52%. https://www.drought.gov/news/study-finds-climate-change-blame-record-breaking-california-wildfires-2023-08-08#:~:text=Study%20Finds%20Climate%20Change%20to%20Blame%20For%20Record%2DBreaking%20California%20Wildfires,-Published%20on&text=Record%2Dbreaking%20forest%20fires%20during,negative%20consequences%20for%20human%20health. You are so full of shit, it ain't even funny anymore. -- On May 30, 2024 Donald J. Trump was unanimously convicted on 34 felony counts in New York City... so I took this picture in my side yard. https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0 "Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC Bible 25B.G. https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0