Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 22:42:26 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: NBC Historian Takes Media's "Bloodbath" Insanity To A Whole New Level Content-Language: en-US Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv References: <6NydnWwGgNc0xWf4nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com> From: moviePig In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 28 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 02:42:29 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 1913 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17bea7625eadf0f8$300665$2218499$46d50c60@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 2295 On 3/20/2024 7:54 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > On Mar 20, 2024 at 3:15:33 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" wrote: > >> BTR1701 wrote: >>> Mar 19, 2024 at 8:26:17 PM PDT, super70s wrote: >>>> On 2024-03-20 02:46:53 +0000, BTR1701 said: >> >>>>> What if the cops held the door open for them. Is that still unauthorized? >> >>>> Lie: The rioters were invited into the Capitol by police >> >>> There is clear video of the police holding the door open for people who were >>> later found guilty of unauthorized entry. >> >>> How does that logically hold up? >> >> With that evidence, why wasn't the charge of unauthorized entry >> withdrawn or dismissed? Seems to me that both the prosecution and judge >> were obligated to do so. > > One would think. Obviously this only applies to a very small number of people > who were there that day but for those to whom it did apply, it seems that as a > matter of law one cannot be guilty of unauthorized entry if the people in > charge of authorizing you let you in. Indeed. Not if one remains in the area he was let into.