Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: David Brown Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: C23 thoughts and opinions Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 15:09:31 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: <87y18047jk.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <87msoe1xxo.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <87ikz11osy.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2024 15:09:31 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="30dbf9dfd6482d43f50a614a4991c28c"; logging-data="1035682"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18c7DkS1ZIblxlqH6sLBFjpNowo9TZbdqE=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:9YgU82wd8wVnZuDfzIR7jUJZmZk= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-GB Bytes: 2934 On 05/06/2024 14:23, Thiago Adams wrote: > ( > I am interested in the C23 subject, but I found almost impossible to > follow such big thread. For me, it is even more difficult without google > groups interface and it consumes a lot of time. > My suggestion is to split C23 topics in smaller ones for the specific > item like embed etc... > ) > I think the "embed" part has run its course - or at least, we have covered everything that could usefully be said about it until we start seeing real-world implementations and real-world usage. (It spawned a lot of nice discussions about implementations of xxd alternatives, but that is not really topical about C23 any more.) Having separate threads for different C23 features would be a fine idea. Pick your favourite - or least favourite - and start a new thread. But let's pick something other than #embed !