Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 04:17:36 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Kamala Outright Lies About Women's Basketball Brackets Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv References: <17d4370a814a9fe0$40$3919488$c2d58868@news.newsdemon.com> Content-Language: en-US From: trotsky In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 147 Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2024 09:17:36 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 7395 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17d6110d4463bc94$14706$3938906$c6d58c68@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 7791 On 6/4/24 4:28 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > On Jun 4, 2024 at 8:35:23 AM PDT, "FPP" wrote: > >> On 6/3/24 10:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>> In article , FPP >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 6/3/24 1:06 PM, shawn wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 3 Jun 2024 12:15:02 -0400, moviePig >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 6/3/2024 3:58 AM, trotsky wrote: >>>>>>> On 6/2/24 7:41 PM, FPP wrote: >>>>>>>> On 6/2/24 11:53 AM, trotsky wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 6/2/24 8:25 AM, FPP wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/24 1:39 PM, trotsky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/24 11:26 AM, moviePig wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/2024 4:43 AM, trotsky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/31/24 5:34 AM, FPP wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/31/24 4:16 AM, trotsky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/30/24 9:53 AM, FPP wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/30/24 4:31 AM, trotsky wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/29/24 3:19 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamala Harris claimed that women's basketball wasn't even >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> allowed to have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> playoff brackets until 2022, when in reality, women's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> basketball has been >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using them since 1982, 42 years. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamala herself tweeted out exchanges with her husband in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2021 where they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> talked about who they were choosing in their brackets. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/yYjH5g9ogXE?t=409 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Between Biden's almost weekly made-up stories about his past >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and Kamala >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gaslighting us about women's basketball, what the hell is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> going on in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> White House? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What the hell is going on with Trump's impending conviction? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, and besides Trump who do you think makes the GOP look >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> worse, Santos or McCarthy? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Harris owned up to the mistake, and explained it... but you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't hear that in Thanny's False Equivalency Gazette. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not a fan of hers but she is upstanding in that way.  The >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GOP isn't upstanding in any way.  My biggest regret is that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump likely won't be sentenced to jail time. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't be too sure.  He's shown no remorse, and he did violate >>>>>>>>>>>>>> gag orders 10 or 11 times.  Those are big mitigating circumstances. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I could see him serving weekends as a punishment.  And even >>>>>>>>>>>>>> community service, which would absolutely humiliate him to death. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fact is, he's going to get some form of punishment. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Judge Merchan is very cool.  It's hard to read how he'll react on >>>>>>>>>>>>> this one.  Your points are well taken though, he should be >>>>>>>>>>>>> sentence accordingly for those reasons.  I'm thinking he'll get >>>>>>>>>>>>> sentenced to home confinement with an ankle bracelet. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The choice of punishment could reasonably consider a convict's >>>>>>>>>>>> likelihood to re-offend.  Since Trump's conviction was ultimately >>>>>>>>>>>> about election interference, the judge might notice that Trump >>>>>>>>>>>> currently stands accused of at least two other instances of >>>>>>>>>>>> exactly that. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Is that your supposition or have you heard that somewhere else? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It's all part of the calculation.  Trump is pushing his luck, and if >>>>>>>>>> he gets time, it'll all be because he's been asking for it. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I could see him doing weekends in jail.  That wouldn't hurt his >>>>>>>>>> campaigning, and would teach him to shut his yap. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> To be fair anybody else in the world who acted as flagrantly as Trump >>>>>>>>> would be hung out to dry--why should the fat orange weasel get any >>>>>>>>> preferential treatment? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Because what the justice system gets away with in low profile cases >>>>>>>> they can't get away with here. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> They're bending over backwards to avoid even the appearance of not >>>>>>>> giving him every break possible. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sure, it's stupid... because they're going to do it anyway. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That's why I think home confinement with a really large ankle bracelet >>>>>>> might be the choice >>> >>>>>> I wonder if they make bejewelled 24K ankle bracelets... >>>>>> >>>>> They don't really need any ankle bracelets since he's got the Secret >>>>> Service protection. Plus he's not likely to skip the country. Most >>>>> likely he would get home confinement to Mar-A-Largo which isn't really >>>>> home confinement. Other than his inability to travel to do rallys. >>>>> It's not like being confined to a 2 bedroom home. >>>>> >>>> Who says? You? >>>> >>>> Why aren't ankle bracelets needed? Is he special? Does the convict get >>>> to choose his jailers now? >>>> >>>> Why Mar-a-Lago? Why not Trump Tower? >>>> He committed the crime in New York. He was indicted and convicted in >>>> New York. Why shouldn't he serve his sentence in (wait for it) New York? >>>> >>>> Who gets to pick? The convict? Is this what your legal instincts tell you? >>>> Or are you just bullshitting in favor or your Dear Leader again? >>> >>> FYI- You're responding to Shawn-- who's generally sympathetic to Dems >>> and on your side-- not me, you dumb fucktard. Look at the attributions >>> from now on before going full froth. >>> >> >> Sorry shawn... I had my bedtime eye ointment in, and must have missed >> the attribution. >> >> Strike the last paragraph. The others are still relevant, though. >> >> Thanny: "Is this what your legal instincts tell you? >> Or are you just bullshitting in favor or your Dear Leader again?" >> >> That's for YOU. > > Up to this point, I haven't commented on Trump's method of punishment AT ALL, Because you have NO BALLS. > so other than directly out of your ass, I have no idea where you're getting > the "Or are you just bullshitting in favor or your Dear Leader again?" and > assigning it to me. > >