Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Good hash for pointers
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2024 16:51:44 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <86zfs1mvov.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <v2n88p$1nlcc$1@dont-email.me> <v2qm8m$2el55$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <v2qnue$2evlu$1@dont-email.me> <v2r9br$2hva2$1@dont-email.me> <86fru6gsqr.fsf@linuxsc.com> <v2sudq$2trh1$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <8634q5hjsp.fsf@linuxsc.com> <v2vmhr$3ffjk$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <86le3wfsmd.fsf@linuxsc.com> <v2voe7$3fr50$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <86ed9ofq14.fsf@linuxsc.com> <v2vs40$3gflh$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <86sexypvff.fsf@linuxsc.com> <20240602104506.000072e4@yahoo.com> <v3kk9p$3u8qu$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <20240603174604.000014d4@yahoo.com> <v3kovm$3v2ie$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <v3kqo3$3v9m2$1@dont-email.me> <20240603201646.0000319d@yahoo.com> <v3l35r$ig0$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2024 01:51:45 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2e3473276f70e973f0e20911b7f6b99d";
	logging-data="112210"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX199lUZ9bIrGcJYx1wCinPc4U2T20id2cBQ="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:nbe1KYcwf2dri3RMdvE/PdtDw0o=
	sha1:AudPlLLihLQcEePGS/IOlRE3AVU=
Bytes: 1968

bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:

> On 03/06/2024 18:16, Michael S wrote:
[...]
>> For big enough Hash_max (Bonita suggests 2**63-1), poor quality
>> of few LS bits of Hash(key) does not matter.
>
> Tim might, [...]

I really don't know where you could have gotten that idea.