Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: John Hall Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv,rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho,rec.arts.sf.tv,rec.arts.sf.fandom Subject: Re: Which Decade was the best for Doctor Who? Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 21:02:06 +0100 Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <1354982695.734545394.097383.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com> Reply-To: John Hall Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=us-ascii;format=flowed X-Trace: individual.net ZX+q98yXEBAUzW10Pt+CJgNw4JPJHrmUrl9SQG+3bZtRYm0H8r X-Orig-Path: jhall.co.uk!john_nospam Cancel-Lock: sha1:1lvSZ3LOpH45mmdEcPw6Pnn3154= sha256:lburd8Kov47EMJz43V8HKw8tCjHFdzWKRBxXp1Dz71U= User-Agent: Turnpike/6.07-M () Bytes: 1821 In message , Cryptoengineer writes >The best Dr. Who decade is the decade in which >you first encounter the show. For me that was the 1960s, but I don't consider that the best decade. For me that would have to be the 1970s. And though William Hartnell was my first Doctor, I consider Tom Baker's Doctor the best. Colin Baker's was the worst - through no fault of his own, it was just that the way the series chose to develop his character was misguided IMO. -- John Hall "Acting is merely the art of keeping a large group of people from coughing." Sir Ralph Richardson (1902-83)