Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: FPP Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Biden Says the Quiet Part Out Loud Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 06:15:44 -0400 Organization: Ph'nglui Mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah'nagl Fhtagn. Lines: 67 Message-ID: References: <2_acneVLrfllrsz7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> <3a5c5jpat8bnft5njj0po49sqfgas54tkq@4ax.com> Reply-To: fredp1571@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 12:15:46 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f1193c63dfcb5b2269cadddd419d2e3d"; logging-data="2306297"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ZSy/ZWFs8cLKqWBP4l2SC" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:rVo5jbq4FyWy0O6VaeqQ1fKNkA4= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 4339 On 5/30/24 12:31 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > In article , FPP > wrote: > >> On 5/28/24 4:20 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>> In article <3a5c5jpat8bnft5njj0po49sqfgas54tkq@4ax.com>, >>> The Horny Goat wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 26 May 2024 09:52:47 -0400, FPP wrote: >>>> >>>>> You've been told FOR DECADES that appearing at the border asking for >>>>> asylum is perfectly legal. >>>>> >>>>> They're not actually illegals, and that's been explained to you FOR >>>>> DECADES too. >>>>> >>>>> We use the term with you because your limited vocabulary skilz requires >>>>> we make it as easy as possible for you to grasp. >>>> >>>> True - but once your refugee claim has been denied, you ARE an >>>> 'illegal' if you don't exit the country within a reasonably short >>>> period of time. If not you can reasonably expect to exit the country >>>> in handcuffs. >>> >>> Not under Democrats. They give them a hearing date a half decade away >>> and when that date eventually rolls around and the illegal doesn't show >>> up... nothing happens. ICE don't come looking, no handcuffs, ICE isn't >>> even allowed to issue an immigration detainer anymore for no-shows. >>> >> It isn't Democrats, dummy. It's judges. > > Judges do not prevent ICE from arresting no-shows and judges do not > prevent ICE from issuing immigration detainers for them. The Biden > administration is doing that. > Prove it. "Biden administration halts limits on ICE arrests following court ruling By Camilo Montoya-Galvez Updated on: June 25, 2022 / 5:12 PM EDT / CBS News" "In September 2021, Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas directed U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents to arrest immigrants deemed to pose a threat to public safety or national security, and migrants who recently crossed a U.S. border unlawfully." And a Federal Judge ruled ICE was in violation of the Constitution. "Wright ruled that ICE officers were violating the Fourth Amendment by using knock-and-talks as a means to lure people they sought to arrest outside their homes. He said the tactic remains legal in situations involving criminal arrest warrants. Since deportation orders fall within civil jurisdiction, agents conducting them do not have the same authority to enter a suspect's property as officers executing a criminal arrest warrant, the judge concluded." -- "Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC Bible 25B.G. https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0 Gracie, age 6. https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0