Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: NBC Historian Takes Media's "Bloodbath" Insanity To A Whole New
 Level
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 11:04:25 -0400
Organization: Ph'nglui Mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah'nagl Fhtagn.
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <uthi9p$29328$6@dont-email.me>
References: <utbtok$pkre$10@dont-email.me>
 <p6mcnRxmu82A02f4nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <utdl0p$19mot$1@dont-email.me>
 <6NydnWwGgNc0xWf4nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <utfn65$1nrjb$1@dont-email.me>
 <J_SdnRPRtZzf6mb4nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <17bea7625eadf0f8$300665$2218499$46d50c60@news.newsdemon.com>
Reply-To: fredp1571@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:04:26 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e4896683bfd1cfec257526adce7267be";
	logging-data="2395208"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+jiycyi8Iu8N1IRqVrZu69"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:RI1485yuLB58A6S9zMYAjQqKbqU=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <17bea7625eadf0f8$300665$2218499$46d50c60@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 3172

On 3/20/24 10:42 PM, moviePig wrote:
> On 3/20/2024 7:54 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>> On Mar 20, 2024 at 3:15:33 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>> Mar 19, 2024 at 8:26:17 PM PDT, super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On 2024-03-20 02:46:53 +0000, BTR1701 said:
>>>>>> What if the cops held the door open for them. Is that still 
>>>>>> unauthorized?
>>>
>>>>> Lie: The rioters were invited into the Capitol by police
>>>
>>>> There is clear video of the police holding the door open for people 
>>>> who were
>>>> later found guilty of unauthorized entry.
>>>
>>>> How does that logically hold up?
>>>
>>> With that evidence, why wasn't the charge of unauthorized entry
>>> withdrawn or dismissed? Seems to me that both the prosecution and judge
>>> were obligated to do so.
>>
>> One would think. Obviously this only applies to a very small number of 
>> people
>> who were there that day but for those to whom it did apply, it seems 
>> that as a
>> matter of law one cannot be guilty of unauthorized entry if the people in
>> charge of authorizing you let you in.
> 
> Indeed.  Not if one remains in the area he was let into.


Jesus, pig... you don't believe that shit do you?  Judges and juries 
sure didn't.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/04/politics/fact-check-capitol-insurrection-january-6-lies/index.html

-- 
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC 
Bible  25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0