Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2024 03:45:43 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Kamala Outright Lies About Women's Basketball Brackets Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv References: <17d4370a814a9fe0$40$3919488$c2d58868@news.newsdemon.com> Content-Language: en-US From: trotsky In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 67 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2024 08:45:44 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 3559 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17d6fb0db995e80d$146161$273357$d54a64@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 3938 On 6/7/24 2:18 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > In article , FPP > wrote: > >> On 6/4/24 5:28 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>> On Jun 4, 2024 at 8:35:23 AM PDT, "FPP" wrote: >>> >>>> On 6/3/24 10:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>> In article , FPP >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 6/3/24 1:06 PM, shawn wrote: > >>>>>>> They don't really need any ankle bracelets since he's got the Secret >>>>>>> Service protection. Plus he's not likely to skip the country. Most >>>>>>> likely he would get home confinement to Mar-A-Largo which isn't >>>>>>> really home confinement. Other than his inability to travel to do >>>>>>> rallys. It's not like being confined to a 2 bedroom home. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Who says? You? >>>>>> >>>>>> Why aren't ankle bracelets needed? Is he special? Does the convict get >>>>>> to choose his jailers now? >>>>>> >>>>>> Why Mar-a-Lago? Why not Trump Tower? >>>>>> He committed the crime in New York. He was indicted and convicted in >>>>>> New York. Why shouldn't he serve his sentence in (wait for it) New >>>>>> York? >>>>>> >>>>>> Who gets to pick? The convict? Is this what your legal instincts tell >>>>>> you? Or are you just bullshitting in favor or your Dear Leader again? >>>>> >>>>> FYI- You're responding to Shawn-- who's generally sympathetic to Dems >>>>> and on your side-- not me, you dumb fucktard. Look at the attributions >>>>> from now on before going full froth. >>>>> >>>> Sorry shawn... I had my bedtime eye ointment in, and must have missed >>>> the attribution. >>>> >>>> Strike the last paragraph. The others are still relevant, though. >>>> >>>> Thanny: "Is this what your legal instincts tell you? >>>> Or are you just bullshitting in favor or your Dear Leader again?" >>>> >>>> That's for YOU. >>> >>> Up to this point, I haven't commented on Trump's method of punishment AT >>> ALL, >>> so other than directly out of your ass, I have no idea where you're getting >>> the "Or are you just bullshitting in favor or your Dear Leader again?" and >>> assigning it to me. > >> You almost never comment on Dear Leader, do you? > > Nice attempt at deflection but no one's falling for it. > > Since I never commented on Trump's method of punishment AT ALL, where > are you getting "Or are you just bullshitting in favor or your Dear > Leader again?", other than out of your ass? > > Remember, you've specifically directed that question to me now, so you > can't pawn it off as a mistake or because your herpes eye unguent > confused you. Ah yes, another part of your repertoire: act like lies of omission don't exist.