Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeds.news.ox.ac.uk!news.ox.ac.uk!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail From: jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com> Newsgroups: talk.origins Subject: Re: Wistar Symposium "Mathematical Challenge to Neo-Darwinism". Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2024 00:19:23 -0400 Organization: What are you looking for? Lines: 34 Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org Message-ID: <5sm76jlrljfct3b1mdqfqfakpd0iu4efgm@4ax.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89"; logging-data="33700"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org Return-Path: X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org id EABD1229870; Sat, 08 Jun 2024 00:19:19 -0400 (EDT) by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD6AC22986E for ; Sat, 08 Jun 2024 00:19:17 -0400 (EDT) id 9489A5DC6A; Sat, 8 Jun 2024 04:19:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org by mod-relay-1.kamens.us (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AF145DC55 for ; Sat, 8 Jun 2024 04:19:25 +0000 (UTC) by nntpmail01.iad.omicronmedia.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BE62E0959 for ; Sat, 8 Jun 2024 04:19:24 +0000 (UTC) id 19F151A8019B; Sat, 8 Jun 2024 04:19:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Path: fx16.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail X-Original-Complaints-To: abuse(at)newshosting.com X-NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2024 04:19:23 UTC Bytes: 3260 On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 11:24:58 -0400, Ron Dean wrote: >jillery wrote: >> On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 12:42:57 -0400, Ron Dean >> wrote: >>=20 >>>>> How many have you read pointing out the flaws >>>>> in evolutionary theory? >>>> >>>> >>>> The problem with that question is you and other cdesign = proponentsists >>>> have a very flawed concept of what qualifies as flaws in = evolutionary >>>> theory. >>>> >>> IOW - None! >>=20 >>=20 >> IOW - when someone says "stasis is the exact opposite of gradual >> change", it shows they have no idea what the words even mean, >> nevermind what they're talking about, nevermind what the people they >> quote are talking about. > > >Then please explain precisely what Gould meant by stasis and = equilibrium. Why sure, just as soon as you explain precisely what you meant by stasis and equilibrium. -- To know less than we don't know is the nature of most knowledge