Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: moviePig Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: White House Surrounded Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 16:17:48 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 41 Message-ID: References: <992248117.739598013.600752.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com> <264998006.739674714.806626.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com> <1105204997.739740476.360973.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com> Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 22:17:50 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5ce17340801d826d9f7e6a9678af8986"; logging-data="656747"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19c7xuWaqoaoCjkhygiubPQFriQuQinC3I=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:DDdTTE+aTZZGbKAMPagcfMw4xMs= In-Reply-To: <1105204997.739740476.360973.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2857 On 6/10/2024 3:29 PM, anim8rfsk wrote: > moviePig wrote: >> On 6/9/2024 9:13 PM, anim8rfsk wrote: >>> moviePig wrote: >>>> On 6/8/2024 11:56 PM, anim8rfsk wrote: >>>>> Adam H. Kerman wrote: >>>>>> BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Seems insurrectiony. >>>>>> >>>>>> Doesn't an insurrectionist have to be an American citizen? Aren't these >>>>>> foreign nationals? Is DHS offering deportation flights to Gaza? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Definitions of insurrectionist >>>>> noun a person who takes part in an armed rebellion against the constituted >>>>> authority >>>>> >>>>> I don’t see anything that says you have to be under the authority of what >>>>> you are rebelling against >>>>> ... >>>> >>>> 'insurrection' -a violent uprising against an authority or government >>>> >>>> I think words like "rebellion" and "uprising" imply you're a subject... >>>> >>> >>> I agree about the implication, but it doesn’t actually seem to be required >>> in the definition >> >> Ah, because you could take part in a neighboring state's insurrection. >> >> But then, your def. does say "THE (rather than A) constituted >> authority". So, a non-subject insurrectionist might at least need prior >> context to establish exactly which authority he's fed up to here with. >> > This definitely seems to need more work. It's a rabbit hole. And the rabbit just a rumor...