Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 17:38:26 +0000 From: BTR1701 Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: [OT] Professor inflitrates pro-Palestinian encampment; union leader calls for consequences References: <20240505204412.000020d9@example.com> User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X) Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 10:47:24 -0700 Message-ID: Lines: 53 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-aS7HlpOL5+gxLt1POI22wKn8KgJJ/fp5z/kOzqisfTWBcw8p0gJNrvnb9fxU0rv1Mex5Swq/zjUCSty!b1qMjHgOh2PHPonx1O94mFW2j3y8kw6Y/zQh71ljlouhV51hUK7eDFhNwpLSqzcEpcF2gCzuAm/H!VPw= X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 3665 In article , moviePig wrote: > On 5/12/2024 10:59 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > > In article , > > moviePig wrote: > > > >> On 5/12/2024 7:01 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > >>> On May 12, 2024 at 3:54:42 PM PDT, "moviePig" wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 5/12/2024 6:16 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > >>>>> In article , > >>>>> moviePig wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On 5/10/2024 1:56 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>>> And now the Scarf Lady, Dr. Deborah Birx, says that thousands of > >>>>>>> Americans could be injured from the mRNA Wuhan Flu shot and that > >>>>>>> some groups should not have been forced to get the jab. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Weird how she wasn't saying that when Biden's decree was "take the > >>>>>>> shot or you're fired" in the federal government. Back then, she > >>>>>>> and your vaunted 'fact checkers' would only repeat the mantra that > >>>>>>> it's 'safe and effective'. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You mean it *shouldn't* have been called safe and effective?... > >>>>> > >>>>> Ask the people who were injured from the jab whether they think the > >>>>> government should have told them it was safe. > >>>> > >>>> I'm asking what a responsible public health official ought to have said. > >>> > >>> How about the truth? > >> > >> The truth is that every medical procedure *including NO procedure* > >> carries some risk. > > > > And an ethical medical professional explains the type and extent of that > > risk, as well as its frequency of occurrence in the population. > > > > They don't ignore the risk and just tell you "it's safe and effective". > > (And don't forget the denigration and censorship of anyone who suggested > > otherwise, who have yet again turned out to be right in the end.) > > People who know there's always a small risk don't need to be told. And > people who *don't* know it will grossly overreact when they *are* told. So once again, it's okay for the government to lie to us for our own good. > So, the public at large heard "safe and effective", which, in context, > the vaccine very much was. Meanwhile, one needn't support censorship to > strongly disapprove of sensationalist life-threatening disinformation.