Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.xs3.de!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: Vincent Maycock <maycock@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: West Virginia creationism
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 13:58:35 -0700
Organization: University of Ediacara
Lines: 43
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <n7jd2j1lamelgiq69tvlih4mh708alb8d7@4ax.com>
References: <gdop0jt4mvqljioufv7stmefniid401svh@4ax.com> <CvnRN.140988$6ePe.119511@fx42.iad> <rcpd1jtljvngh3g3s7455lun0ukjlrqoeb@4ax.com> <2VYRN.256204$hN14.193303@fx17.iad> <4fch1jpp5qtolug4bj158sl9tvn8h7htp9@4ax.com> <ZudSN.257840$hN14.25285@fx17.iad> <folk1jhbg7o63c0spnibf1j72jeb6tcllc@4ax.com> <RUISN.631461$Ama9.561968@fx12.iad> <lafv1jp2fv47for3jusorqcmncfk1d9142@4ax.com> <IA3UN.953$9pR2.722@fx13.iad> <dsbc2jhon7ontdokugvdfg6tedrqnkntq4@4ax.com> <%AzVN.19359$8tL7.11884@fx09.iad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
	logging-data="4771"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Bytes: 4570

On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 16:16:59 -0400, Ron Dean
<rondean-noreply@gmail.com> wrote:

>Martin Harran wrote:
>> On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 03:03:03 -0400, Ron Dean
[...]
>>>  From then, each succeeding generation the
>>> deleterious mutations multiplied. I think possibly the proofreading and
>>> repair, which was an elegantly and highly sophisticated design set up
>>> for the best results, but over the vast spans of time even the P&R
>>> mechanisms, which initially were perfect, but with the passage of time
>>> even the P&R became less perfect due to bad mutations that slipped
>>> passed the P&R mechanisms, consequent the P&R systems were affected. The
>>> results we see today.
>> 
>> Again, I wish you would dress my actual question - where does your
>> intelligent designer fit into that process?
> >
>It seems that after the task was completed it said "It is done".

Why do you think that happened? 

>left things with the capacity and ability  to take care of itself.

And how did that turn out for him, given the pervasiveness of
extinction? 

> It 
>seems that the designer left the scene. Over time and the 2ND law 
>everything enters into downward tends, copying errors occur, things tend 
>to disintegrate and inevitably things move towards dissolution and 
>decay. 

If you believe the Designer is God, perhaps you could fill us in on
what we should expect to see if that designer was responsible for
life's diversity. What should we be looking for to prove or disprove
your "hypothesis"?

>I had some beautiful pine trees in my
>acreage. But a patch died, collapsed and are in a process of decay. This 
>is typical. The same will
>happen to our bodies.
>>