Path: ...!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2024 19:22:12 +0000 From: BTR1701 Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Kamala Outright Lies About Women's Basketball Brackets References: <17d4370a814a9fe0$40$3919488$c2d58868@news.newsdemon.com> User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.5.3b3 (Intel Mac OS X) Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2024 12:18:51 -0700 Message-ID: Lines: 62 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-2EJQZD5JZiPI3QUBWqJTkDTTpEtUeHfjPftz3jjovU+J1MUjoMeVMAgpx4rtprLAXAiTbJetzsYVb86!LDqEt7RQmNrU+pT4GZLIg4I7Y8OyjEu4ieXvonFSg1xMXFTiXt9WBxF05tMiO5RvuxrWfSAlDV7q!9AU= X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 3779 In article , FPP wrote: > On 6/4/24 5:28 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > > On Jun 4, 2024 at 8:35:23 AM PDT, "FPP" wrote: > > > >> On 6/3/24 10:43 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > >>> In article , FPP > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> On 6/3/24 1:06 PM, shawn wrote: > >>>>> They don't really need any ankle bracelets since he's got the Secret > >>>>> Service protection. Plus he's not likely to skip the country. Most > >>>>> likely he would get home confinement to Mar-A-Largo which isn't > >>>>> really home confinement. Other than his inability to travel to do > >>>>> rallys. It's not like being confined to a 2 bedroom home. > >>>>> > >>>> Who says? You? > >>>> > >>>> Why aren't ankle bracelets needed? Is he special? Does the convict get > >>>> to choose his jailers now? > >>>> > >>>> Why Mar-a-Lago? Why not Trump Tower? > >>>> He committed the crime in New York. He was indicted and convicted in > >>>> New York. Why shouldn't he serve his sentence in (wait for it) New > >>>> York? > >>>> > >>>> Who gets to pick? The convict? Is this what your legal instincts tell > >>>> you? Or are you just bullshitting in favor or your Dear Leader again? > >>> > >>> FYI- You're responding to Shawn-- who's generally sympathetic to Dems > >>> and on your side-- not me, you dumb fucktard. Look at the attributions > >>> from now on before going full froth. > >>> > >> Sorry shawn... I had my bedtime eye ointment in, and must have missed > >> the attribution. > >> > >> Strike the last paragraph. The others are still relevant, though. > >> > >> Thanny: "Is this what your legal instincts tell you? > >> Or are you just bullshitting in favor or your Dear Leader again?" > >> > >> That's for YOU. > > > > Up to this point, I haven't commented on Trump's method of punishment AT > > ALL, > > so other than directly out of your ass, I have no idea where you're getting > > the "Or are you just bullshitting in favor or your Dear Leader again?" and > > assigning it to me. > You almost never comment on Dear Leader, do you? Nice attempt at deflection but no one's falling for it. Since I never commented on Trump's method of punishment AT ALL, where are you getting "Or are you just bullshitting in favor or your Dear Leader again?", other than out of your ass? Remember, you've specifically directed that question to me now, so you can't pawn it off as a mistake or because your herpes eye unguent confused you.