Path: ...!feed.opticnetworks.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: moviePig Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Cruz Destroys Gender Activist Judge During Hearing Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 18:18:49 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 300 Message-ID: References: <_qidnWbvU5joYdL7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> <17d7e76cd8efdd72$13635$3694546$c0d58a68@news.newsdemon.com> Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 00:18:51 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="58424f7a7bb30b8e45b5386210dd4adf"; logging-data="1336628"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/OZcps5w2kqwBcqrLER3T4VFSoaD34ShU=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:b+X4i8Ej/u4PNgrd6uL9xV0zRAo= In-Reply-To: <17d7e76cd8efdd72$13635$3694546$c0d58a68@news.newsdemon.com> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 13854 On 6/11/2024 4:57 AM, trotsky wrote: > On 6/10/24 12:13 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >> On Jun 10, 2024 at 4:21:06 AM PDT, "FPP" wrote: >> >>> On 6/8/24 9:48 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>   On Jun 7, 2024 at 5:51:24 AM PDT, "FPP" wrote: >>>>>   On 6/4/24 5:09 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>     On Jun 4, 2024 at 8:25:10 AM PDT, "FPP" >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>     On 6/3/24 10:35 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>       In article , FPP >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>       wrote: >>>>>>>>>       On 6/3/24 2:22 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>       In article , FPP >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>       wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>       On 6/2/24 10:05 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>       FPP wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>       On 6/2/24 3:26 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>       So when you said you don't talk about another >>>>>>>>>>>>>> state's governor because >>>>>>>>>>>>>>       he doesn't affect your life... that was... wait for >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it... a lie. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>       How does eating out affect my life? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>       Now, trying to destroy capitalism and education in >>>>>>>>>>>>> the country is >>>>>>>>>>>>>       another matter. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>       Your own words: another state's governor doesn't >>>>>>>>>>>> affect my life. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>       Weird how you're now claiming some governors have the >>>>>>>>>>>> power to >>>>>>>>>>>> do exactly >>>>>>>>>>>>       that by "destroying capitalism and education" >>>>>>>>>>>> throughout the entire >>>>>>>>>>>>       country by signing laws that only apply to their >>>>>>>>>>>> respective states. How >>>>>>>>>>>>       does DeSantis signing an education bill that only >>>>>>>>>>>> applies to Florida >>>>>>>>>>>>       affect your life, Effa? >>>>>>>>       Still no answer here. >>>>>>>>>>>>       But for some reason when Newsom signs laws, according >>>>>>>>>>>> to Effa the Hutt, >>>>>>>>>>>>       he only has the power to affect California, despite >>>>>>>>>>>> the fact >>>>>>>>>>>> that in many >>>>>>>>>>>>       cases, he actually does affect the whole country with >>>>>>>>>>>> his bullshit. Like >>>>>>>>>>>>       when he banned all gas-powered vehicles by 2035. That >>>>>>>>>>>> affects the whole >>>>>>>>>>>>       country because California is such a large percentage >>>>>>>>>>>> of the car market, >>>>>>>>>>>>       vehicle manufacturers conform their products to >>>>>>>>>>>> California standards >>>>>>>>>>>>       regardless of where they'll eventually be sold. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>       Newsom went out to eat. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>       Newsom did exactly what Cruz did that gets your panties >>>>>>>>>> in a twist: he >>>>>>>>>>       went on vacation while his state was in crisis. And he >>>>>>>>>> did it twice. >>>>>>>>>>       Cruz only did it once. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>       DeSantis is destroying a state. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>       Not your state. Doesn't affect your life. Your words. >>>>>>>>>       Nope. False equivalence. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>       Newsom owned up to it. >>>>>>>>       Newsom never 'owned up' to fleeing the state for vacation. >>>>>>>> Once he got >>>>>>>>       caught, he admitted his maskless indoor dining at the >>>>>>>> French Laundry was >>>>>>>>       wrong. But he never gave a mea culpa for being on vacation >>>>>>>> in Cabo while >>>>>>>>       he his state was on fire. >>>>>>>     You guys caused the fires, ignoring climate change. >>>>>>     To quote our newest Hutt: Nope. >>>>>>     This nonsense that the California wildfires are due to >>>>>> 'climate change' is >>>>>>     ridiculous. Even Emperor Newsom has admitted that historically >>>>>> bad forest >>>>>>     management at both the federal and state level is a major >>>>>> factor in the >>>>>>     severity and frequency of the most recent wildfires. >>>>>>     Anyone who thinks that if we'd all just installed more solar >>>>>> panels and >>>>>> rode >>>>>>     our bikes to work, that the state wouldn't be on fire every >>>>>> year is >>>>>>   completely >>>>>>     delusional. And these idiotic media reporters and politicians >>>>>> who keep >>>>>>   saying >>>>>>     that the amount of acreage burned in California in 2019-- the >>>>>> worst fire >>>>>>   year >>>>>>     (2.2 million acres)-- is 'record-breaking' and 'unprecedented' >>>>>> are >>>>>>   bald-faced >>>>>>     liars. It's fucking factually completely untrue. >>>>>>     Before the 1800s, California would see anywhere from 5 to 14 >>>>>> million acres >>>>>>     burn EVERY YEAR. That's 12% of the state burning every year. >>>>>> Before there >>>>>>   were >>>>>>     any SUVs or 'climate change'. Just as there were massive >>>>>> droughts in >>>>>>     California long before the era of 'climate change'. California >>>>>> had a >>>>>>   500-year >>>>>>     drought between 800 and 1300 AD. These are documented >>>>>> scientific facts, >>>>>> but >>>>>>     that undermines the Agenda, so we get flat-out lies from >>>>>> politicians >>>>>>   claiming >>>>>>     this is unprecedented, which goes completely unchallenged by >>>>>> their media >>>>>>     lackeys. >>>>>>     Excess timber comes out of a forest in only one of two ways. >>>>>> It's either >>>>>>     carried out or it burns up. We used to carry it out. It was >>>>>> called >>>>>> logging. >>>>>>   We >>>>>>     had healthy forests and a thriving timber economy. Then in the >>>>>> 70s, we >>>>>> began >>>>>>     imposing a shit-ton of environmental laws-- both at the state >>>>>> and federal >>>>>>     level-- that have made it all but impossible and wildly >>>>>> unprofitable to >>>>>>   carry >>>>>>     out that timber and what we've seen over those decades is >>>>>> increasingly >>>>>>   severe >>>>>>     forest fires. >>>>>>     We've had an 80% decline in timber harvested out of California >>>>>> forests >>>>>> since >>>>>>     1980 and we've had 85% increase in acres destroyed by fire >>>>>> over that same >>>>>>     period. The mismanagement has gotten to the point where you >>>>>> can tell the >>>>>>     boundary between private forestland that is not affected by >>>>>> these laws and >>>>>>   the >>>>>>     public lands that are. The burn scars follow the property >>>>>> lines almost >>>>>>   exactly >>>>>>     in many cases. >>>>>>     Wow, the climate sure is clever to only change over the public >>>>>> lands and >>>>>>   burn >>>>>>     them while leaving the private lands alone, isn't it? >>>>>>     An untended forest will grow and grow until it chokes itself >>>>>> off. When >>>>>> there >>>>>>     are too many trees for the land to support, they start dying >>>>>> off, and that >>>>>>     dead timber becomes thousands of square miles of fuel, just >>>>>> waiting to be >>>>>>   set >>>>>>     ablaze. California currently has four times the timber density >>>>>> that the >>>>>> land >>>>>>     can support. Even the reliably leftist L.A. Times, which never ========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========