Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!postmaster.netnews.com!us8.netnews.com!not-for-mail
X-Trace: DXC=k7>eT@bE3<jUW9:WcN5a;fU5[F2hIijDo7J470dMQQ7kJ4R`5ADBYnb78WECPL4LUgKOZ<<SlTG=cO?Ib8FT2<naf@HSLgR[]oh7dKkgDfTEDliJPUY0^i>7f
X-Complaints-To: support@frugalusenet.com
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 16:04:27 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Quantum mystics
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
References: <v44t6u$3n7fn$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
From: bitrex <user@example.net>
In-Reply-To: <v44t6u$3n7fn$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <66660acb$0$3747319$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1
X-Trace: 1717963467 reader.netnews.com 3747319 127.0.0.1:43099
Bytes: 1445

On 6/9/2024 2:46 PM, Jeroen Belleman wrote:

  He did
> not mention that you have to make *correlated* measurements to
> detect entanglement. For that, you need to communicate *what*
> measurement is to be made at each location, and that implies
> that you either prescribe the exact measurement in advance or
> select a subset of the results after the fact.

Sounds like stuff from the "stuff everyone knows" department.

Maybe one of those cases where the presenter has spent so much time at a 
certain level they overestimate the background of the audience.