Path: ...!news.nobody.at!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.xs3.de!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: Animated Series
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 10:09:58 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 84
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <fjervi5lp5jvua9npr79gj1rjn3g9acgv9@4ax.com>
References: <977pviltbihuce6loh8uh88hldcsuonjb8@4ax.com> <XGfLN.16179482$ee1.11242105@fx16.ams4>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
	logging-data="31181"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.20.32.1218
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:EZ4vcpjbZugcq0GJ5N/YKept050=
Bytes: 4706

On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 13:27:19 GMT, the following appeared in
talk.origins, posted by someone37 <admin@answernot42.com>:

>In reply to "Bob Casanova" who wrote the following:
>
>> On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 08:39:33 +0000, the following appeared
>> in talk.origins, posted by *Hemidactylus*
>> <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid>:
>> 
>> > someone37 <admin@answernot42.com> wrote:
>> > > 
>> > [snip]
>> > > 
>> > > The reason is that any computation can be done with an arrangement of NAND
>> > > gates (they are functionally complete) is because a claim that it could 
>> > > would be
>> > > tantamount to suggesting that NAND gates could only be arranged in a 
>> > > certain way
>> > > if the reality was one in which things experienced.
>> > > 
>> > Aha, NAND gates. Seems the past 36 incarnations of “someone” were
>> > insufficient to the task so the resurrection ship spawned another. Here we
>> > go again…
>> > 
>> I knew he (she? it?) sounded familiar. And if anything even
>> more incoherent than previously.
>> > 
>> --
>> 
>> Bob C.
>> 
>> "The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
>>  the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
>>  'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
>> 
>> - Isaac Asimov
>
>Bob C., mentions a minor argument
>
No, I did not; I mentioned your incoherence during your
prior appearance, which IIRC I noted at the time. You have
yet to formulate a coherent argument.
>
>, which explained why whether any of reality is 
>experienced or not is not computable. Which could be thought to be an issue for 
>a physicalist belief in which we are evolved biological machines whose brains 
>are running some type of neural network computation (because we can tell that at 
>least part of reality is experiencing, which isn't computable). Noticeably Bob 
>C., didn't offer any flaw in the argument
>
There was no argument involving you in which I was also
involved. Have you always been delusional?
>
>, but I am grateful for him having 
>looked at the video, and brought up an argument from it. Though the main issues 
>raised in that particular video from the series were the Influence Issue, and 
>the Fine Tuning of the Experience Issue, which he didn't mention. 
>
>For those that would be interested in just diving into a specific part of the 
>series to understand what is being referred to, you could just follow this link 
>(which skips the first 7 minutes of 4.Belief): https://vimeo.com/921153137#t=7m
>
>There are some comebacks to "4. Belief" covered in the next one in the series, 
>"5. Issues with belief?".
>Series link:https://vimeo.com/showcase/the-lottery-issue
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Wish you all well, and as a wise man might say:
> "Follow the loving selfless path".
>
>https://vimeo.com/showcase/the-lottery-issue
-- 

Bob C.

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
 the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"

- Isaac Asimov