Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: FPP Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: NBC Historian Takes Media's "Bloodbath" Insanity To A Whole New Level Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 06:59:54 -0400 Organization: Ph'nglui Mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah'nagl Fhtagn. Lines: 60 Message-ID: References: <6NydnWwGgNc0xWf4nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com> <17bea7625eadf0f8$300665$2218499$46d50c60@news.newsdemon.com> <17bed5b715bf3f58$7434$1098985$c8d58268@news.newsdemon.com> Reply-To: fredp1571@gmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 10:59:54 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6a12f5494fe329ae11de877e3270d04b"; logging-data="3033712"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/pVQwxQEDN/h1KX+ziSc+/" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ycmcpl4lfYGZwaOTvU30ks0sdJI= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 4159 On 3/21/24 1:14 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > In article <17bed5b715bf3f58$7434$1098985$c8d58268@news.newsdemon.com>, > moviePig wrote: > >> On 3/21/2024 11:04 AM, FPP wrote: >>> On 3/20/24 10:42 PM, moviePig wrote: >>>> On 3/20/2024 7:54 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>> On Mar 20, 2024 at 3:15:33 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>> Mar 19, 2024 at 8:26:17 PM PDT, super70s >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2024-03-20 02:46:53 +0000, BTR1701 said: >>>>>>>>> What if the cops held the door open for them. Is that still >>>>>>>>> unauthorized? >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Lie: The rioters were invited into the Capitol by police >>>>>> >>>>>>> There is clear video of the police holding the door open for people >>>>>>> who were later found guilty of unauthorized entry. >>>>>> >>>>>>> How does that logically hold up? >>>>>> >>>>>> With that evidence, why wasn't the charge of unauthorized entry >>>>>> withdrawn or dismissed? Seems to me that both the prosecution and judge >>>>>> were obligated to do so. >>>>> >>>>> One would think. Obviously this only applies to a very small number >>>>> of people who were there that day but for those to whom it did apply, >>>>> it seems that as a matter of law one cannot be guilty of unauthorized >>>>> entry if the people in charge of authorizing you let you in. >>>> >>>> Indeed. Not if one remains in the area he was let into. >>> >>> Jesus, pig... you don't believe that shit do you?  Judges and juries >>> sure didn't. >>> >>> https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/04/politics/fact-check-capitol-insurrection-janu >>> ary-6-lies/index.html >> >> I believe pretty much that whole article, including the admission that a >> couple of police might've allowed a couple of rioters in. But what I >> was addressing is the fact that allowing them into the building doesn't >> equate to allowing them into Pelosi's office to shit on her desk. > > Which would be relevant if the people who were let in were actually the > desk-sitters. > Nobody was let in. Broken doors and broken windows at the scene of an ongoing riot are hardly indicators that you have permission to be there. -- "Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC Bible 25B.G. https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0 Gracie, age 6. https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0