Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Cryptoengineer Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.fandom Subject: Re: Readercon code of conduct Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2024 03:37:17 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 35 Message-ID: References: <0001HW.2C0541490026A28F70000C14238F@news.supernews.com> <6d889d1e-5052-901d-dd07-631edd4f4677@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2024 05:37:18 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="799f76f8d09e8db57413f093089377db"; logging-data="3369136"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+wlj6dohV/qkMOpGhsc+iRaGOkZx8vXWw=" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPad) Cancel-Lock: sha1:QSVH4zRNhbsAVSWRMKZ8/BoOblY= sha1:mA+2QkIxJmGnHTs1F9ilOckPOQQ= Bytes: 2344 D wrote: > > > On Wed, 29 May 2024, Keith F. Lynch wrote: > >> Gary McGath wrote: >>> If this thread ever gets back to convention codes of conduct, >>> someone ping me. I've skipped over most of it. >> >> Volume here is low enough, why not read everything? (Except the >> Dr. Who verbal diarrhea of course.) >> > > I think the thread has lost its moment, due to the magical "meeting of > minds" and growing of empathy that so often occurs on usenet! ;) > Ive noticed a growing trend of people who reject formal expertise and rigorous, data based knowledge development, instead loudly espousing ill informed, unsupported positions, mostly obtained from social media. D is certainly an example of this, but it happens to a lot of people, in areas in which they aren't experts themselves. It's a disheartening phenomenon. I think it makes people feel 'smart', that they have a special handle on what's going on, even when it's based on demonstrable idiocies. Social media enable this, allowing every crackpot to find a community of the equally cracked. Pt