Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.xs3.de!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: j.nobel.daggett@gmail.com (LDagget)
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: Evidence v Conclusions
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2024 14:38:14 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <ecbdbe72b12496cecb6d807b77b50cd8@www.novabbs.com>
References: <1tf21jdg30uru7c2ossq8j6ifrqdcefh0l@4ax.com> <86o7amocxq.fsf@example.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
	logging-data="60080"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Bytes: 2663
Lines: 23

Richmond wrote:

> jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com> writes:

 . . .

> But people also say they know electrons exist, whereas they have never
> actually seen one, but interpret electricity as evidence of them.

> So you could have the same discussion in a less emotive way by
> discussing electrons and lightning instead of God and earthquakes.


That's quite false as there exist many different independent lines
of evidence for the existence of electrons beyond modeling the 
flow of electricity.

Are you even aware of who JJ Thomson is? If so, do you understand
what he did? And since then there are so many more experiments that
can detect single electrons. It would take perverse mental gymnastics
to view the dynamic data obtained in some of the dual slit electron
diffraction studies to avoid the reality that what is being detected,
AKA "seen", are single electrons.