Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Cryptoengineer Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written,rec.arts.sf.fandom Subject: Re: Babel Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 19:58:28 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 37 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 23:58:30 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f72de17d8b19ec2ce3319d4303eca377"; logging-data="4085794"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+roUp6N9VhF0QfRQO9Mx9dIqrg9Yw88rk=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:QxP/fTmDDqy7F4tKo1Mzj5r3mBs= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2652 On 3/28/2024 7:04 PM, Gary McGath wrote: > On 3/28/24 12:21 PM, Paul S Person wrote: > >> As to Jan 6 2021 -- if Trump is/was, in fact, an agent of Putin (as >> many of his supporters appear to be, given their eagerness to gift >> Putin Ukraine), then it was not an insurrection -- it was treason, >> pure and simple. > > So now opposition to US foreign policy is "treason." I've heard that > line too often before. "Love it or leave it." Trump wasn't opposing US foreign policy. He was opposing the counting of electoral votes, using a violent mob, because the normal operation of government was going to put him out of power. At very least, that's insurrection. I really doubt that Trump actually takes orders from Moscow, but he does seem to admire Putin, and its possible that Putin has kompromat on him, which bends his actions even if not given explicit instructions. Looking at the actual law, 18 USC Ch. 115: TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES says: ยง2381. Treason Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them OR [helps enemies of the US] Shal https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=%2Fprelim%40title18%2Fpart1%2Fchapter115&edition=prelim With that, I think you can argue that Trumps actions *might* meet the clause before the OR. In that case, yes, he committed treason. pt