Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact --
 closure
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 23:21:56 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <v404mk$3b1i8$2@i2pn2.org>
References: <v3o2dj$jm9q$1@dont-email.me> <v3s5g6$36git$2@i2pn2.org>
	<v3sc8c$1gra7$2@dont-email.me> <v3tq33$388rj$13@i2pn2.org>
	<v3tstr$1td1o$2@dont-email.me> <v3tuqh$388ri$1@i2pn2.org>
	<v3v0qj$22vrk$1@dont-email.me> <v3v85d$39ri5$11@i2pn2.org>
	<v3vacl$242e9$8@dont-email.me> <v3vh9l$a5e$2@news.muc.de>
	<v3vhvq$25ojk$2@dont-email.me> <v3vj8p$39ri6$7@i2pn2.org>
	<v3vk9b$266aq$2@dont-email.me>
	<8c92495d4433776d8ddc4706fb1de05b245f5829.camel@gmail.com>
	<v3vn5u$26d04$1@dont-email.me> <v3vont$a5e$3@news.muc.de>
	<v3vp3j$27d15$2@dont-email.me> <v3vpsg$39ri6$12@i2pn2.org>
	<v400hl$287qb$3@dont-email.me> <v4016m$3avmq$1@i2pn2.org>
	<v401vc$28q9r$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 23:21:56 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3507784"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2383
Lines: 19

Am Fri, 07 Jun 2024 17:35:24 -0500 schrieb olcott:

> On 6/7/2024 5:22 PM, joes wrote:
>> Am Fri, 07 Jun 2024 17:11:00 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>> That it is literally impossible to prove that the following is false
>>> conclusively proves that it is true and the proof really need not be
>>> wrapped in any tuxedo.
Why do you care about rebuttals if you don't even consider them possible?

>>> We can get on to other key points only after we have closure on this
>>> {foundation of simulating halt deciders} point.
>> What do you need closure for? You only want agreement.
> I must get closure on each of the four points of my proof so that I know
> that my words can possibly be understood. Without this publication is
> hopeless.
Publication IS hopeless. As far as your words can be understood, they are
wrong. You could just post all of them.

-- 
joes