Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Bill Sloman Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,uk.d-i-y Subject: Re: OT: A lot better than a Covid death shot! Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 18:09:27 +1100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 36 Message-ID: References: <9fjjuid0i28o79c3nvlhuuao81ffqthv22@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 07:09:40 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9c1b1c545e53ec7daf7071b041912250"; logging-data="1647691"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Out9E/tdaeK3bSI686C3iC4ZI6AcWb6g=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:0gbvTYkV/kL+TBUXUf3KqTubZdU= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 2563 On 8/03/2024 4:48 am, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 07/03/2024 15:15, GB wrote: >> On 07/03/2024 15:11, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> On 07/03/2024 15:05, Bill Sloman wrote: >>>> There's not a shred of evidence that Covid-19 was any kind of >>>> laboratory-developed virus, and virus labs are actually pretty good >>>> at keeping dangerous viruses safely locked up. It's a stupid idea, >>>> but Cursitor Doom and Jan Panteltje like it. >>> >>> Actually its pretty much the main streamĀ  consensus that the virus >>> was cooked up in a lab, and escaped. >>> >> >> Is that the consensus amongst people who really know what they are >> talking about? >> >> > As far as I know, yes. But you don't know much, and don't go to any trouble to find out evidence that you'd prefer not to know about. > https://oversight.house.gov/release/covid-origins-hearing-wrap-up-facts-science-evidence-point-to-a-wuhan-lab-leak%EF%BF%BC/ > > is a fairly good overview. The problem is that accusing China of being > uber sloppy was not politically *convenient*. So the default position > initially was a 'we just dont know' > > Apparently now, we know a lot more... But you can't point to any of this "new: information. -- Bill Sloman, Sydney