Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: google antitrust trial
Date: Sun, 5 May 2024 14:32:56 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 59
Message-ID: <v18tu8$230e1$3@dont-email.me>
References: <v167bf$pnd$1@solani.org> <v169go$1dl1l$1@dont-email.me>
 <v16pr7$27se$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <v16to4$1lafn$3@dont-email.me> <op.2m98kurxbyq249@pvr2.lan>
 <v175b1$1mmg1$1@dont-email.me> <op.2nadm2e0byq249@pvr2.lan>
 <v18cuh$1v29t$2@dont-email.me> <op.2na73mlgbyq249@pvr2.lan>
 <v18hsr$204qg$1@dont-email.me> <op.2na96yy3byq249@pvr2.lan>
 <v18ktd$20qmq$1@dont-email.me> <op.2nbem6h9byq249@pvr2.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 05 May 2024 23:32:57 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="df68ad3298795cc81f9294b29f1e6c73";
	logging-data="2195905"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX191DZebHpcXWsofXZrpGlIE9YkSOnw/OF4="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:hlDhIu4bRmCbwQ7w21egoK/6G8w=
Content-Language: en-CA
In-Reply-To: <op.2nbem6h9byq249@pvr2.lan>
Bytes: 3549

On 2024-05-05 13:17, Rod Speed wrote:
> On Mon, 06 May 2024 04:58:53 +1000, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 2024-05-05 11:41, Rod Speed wrote:
>>> On Mon, 06 May 2024 04:07:23 +1000, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2024-05-05 10:56, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 06 May 2024 02:42:56 +1000, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2024-05-04 23:58, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 05 May 2024 15:26:57 +1000, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2024-05-04 22:08, Rod Speed wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 05 May 2024 13:17:23 +1000, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-05-04 19:10, Andrew wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hank Rogers wrote on Sat, 4 May 2024 16:32:03 -0500 :
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Surely the same people here who were defending Apple’s 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> business model will
>>>>>>>>>>>>> come to Google’s defense now too…
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Google will get off with a slap on the wrist. Maybe they'll 
>>>>>>>>>>>> later buy apple
>>>>>>>>>>>> and increase their presence.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The two cults will merge their churches.
>>>>>>>>>>>  Both Google and Apple stretch the laws, which is why both 
>>>>>>>>>>> lose so many
>>>>>>>>>>> lawsuits; but what's different is nobody defends Google to 
>>>>>>>>>>> the death.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Apple hasn't lost any lawsuits.
>>>>>>>>>  Yes it has, most obviously with intellectual
>>>>>>>>> property lawsuits and tax lawsuits.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cite one.
>>>>>>>  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litigation_involving_Apple_Inc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 'Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name.'
>>>>>  <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litigation_involving_Apple_Inc.>
>>>>
>>>> You might want to look at how many suits that article shows Apple 
>>>> lost...
>>>  Nope, that's what I was saying all along,
> 
>> Read it again.
> 
> No need.

So you think.

> Pity about
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Inc._v._Samsung_Electronics_Co.
> and yes you need to manually add the . in the browser box again

Pity about you not understanding what the issue is...