Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!campaignwiki.org!.POSTED.staticline-31-183-192-166.toya.net.pl!not-for-mail From: Kyonshi Newsgroups: rec.games.frp.dnd Subject: Re: OneDnD seems to mainstream psionics Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 12:31:22 +0200 Organization: Campaign Wiki Message-ID: References: <7ivk2j560cru7gbb1eb1gl0drn76k2pg6b@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 11:02:56 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: sibirocobombus.campaignwiki; posting-host="staticline-31-183-192-166.toya.net.pl:31.183.192.166"; logging-data="3227202"; mail-complaints-to="alex@alexschroeder.ch" User-Agent: Betterbird (Windows) Hamster/2.1.0.1548 Cancel-Lock: sha1:6WxWXJ+DVclRKJ5+KXSyNHQAtcM= sha256:zuamoc0Z8ThWZNlPBJontWUzJ5D4KClfLCxYfxV8NrE= sha1:65jPAhmM3opKMt4DxX7FT5nJ1x0= sha256:fvpo18wSWK94Aiti/cuYuYhUOiSfY1sBiZ5ZycJ3BNY= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 2278 Lines: 23 On 4/25/2024 11:43 PM, Justisaur wrote: > On 4/25/2024 10:57 AM, Kyonshi wrote: >> On 4/25/2024 6:16 PM, Spalls Hurgenson wrote: > >> >> Don't forget warlocks, which didn't use to be a thing but now are. On >> the other hand it sounds as if those they want to have are just >> variations on fighters and thieves instead of proper psions. > > Warlocks and Sorcerers were both added in 3.5e  I liked the iterations > in that edition much better.  They both feel like they should be > sub-classes and in optional books.  Do you really need 3 charisma based > arcane full caster base classes in the PHB?  Heck there's only 2 full > physical classes. > > As much as I love psionics, I'd prefer Nitpick: sorcerers were a core class in 3e. Warlocks came in a supplement in 3.5. I never really got sorcerers, I think they were supposed to be what the warlock became later, just that it wasn't mechanically set apart from wizards all that much.