Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!campaignwiki.org!.POSTED.staticline-31-183-170-123.toya.net.pl!not-for-mail From: Kyonshi Newsgroups: rec.games.frp.dnd Subject: Re: Labyrinth Lord (B/X clone) 2nd Edition Draft - What is your impression? Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 19:23:18 +0200 Organization: Campaign Wiki Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 17:52:09 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: sibirocobombus.campaignwiki; posting-host="staticline-31-183-170-123.toya.net.pl:31.183.170.123"; logging-data="797559"; mail-complaints-to="alex@alexschroeder.ch" User-Agent: Betterbird (Windows) Hamster/2.1.0.1548 Cancel-Lock: sha1:rqdMf18DTOu/2tE8Srs6ogNWxRE= sha256:ShGsKI34ABlpat1qxbzKAaho7WpL3bpEv3g8aM8/xmg= sha1:RD14xe17pps89HO1nYS0YrgoX6w= sha256:aR9EU8claGcSVVS/coBqHSarpuHFlL/Qe06YT2wIFkU= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 2267 Lines: 24 On 6/7/2024 5:24 PM, Maik Wagner wrote: > On Fri, 7 Jun 2024 12:58:04 +0200, Kyonshi wrote: >> So having a different LL instead of a straight off copy of DnD makes >> sense. > > I see your point. You explained it well. > > Personally I do not think that I will adapt these new rules or options > but will take some elaborations, adventure hooks and background on the > "Known Lands" into my campaign and for this I would probably go for a > possible free "No Art Version". > > I mostly translate OGL/CreativeCommons material into German anyway and > did some translation work on OSRIC as well for private use. > > So in that respect I can see myself taking some stuff from a possible > free edition of the new Labyrinth Lord but do not want to spend my money > on it yet. Well, you never know.. > > Have a good day, > Maik well, I doubt I would use all of it as well, but I use my own (LL-derived) rules anyway, so I might just buy the book for the artwork and as a reference book.