Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 07:55:05 +0000 Newsgroups: rec.games.frp.dnd Subject: Re: OneDnD seems to mainstream psionics From: Ubiquitous Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 03:54:47 -0400 X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.12N (x86 32bit) References: <7ivk2j560cru7gbb1eb1gl0drn76k2pg6b@4ax.com> Message-ID: Lines: 21 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-5laICUjoUmIFdLXucztJQ3lTwcvLdoHJ9p4WoZVT25wIfkHYtFE8ty3ryVyLHRBi+e+XLKPzjAaBlnP!jbp8trKw9j84wS3CqFtMj0ZvzysLhgKGVe6Rk/GL8/4DoE3JKn/LyJoebIhqNcW5wKFOHWcGWUPJ X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 2019 In article , justisaur@yahoo.com wrote: > On 4/25/2024 10:57 AM, Kyonshi wrote: >> On 4/25/2024 6:16 PM, Spalls Hurgenson wrote: >> Don't forget warlocks, which didn't use to be a thing but now are. On >> the other hand it sounds as if those they want to have are just >> variations on fighters and thieves instead of proper psions. > >Warlocks and Sorcerers were both added in 3.5e I liked the iterations >in that edition much better. They both feel like they should be >sub-classes and in optional books. Do you really need 3 charisma based >arcane full caster base classes in the PHB? Heck there's only 2 full >physical classes. I like Warlocks as witches and would play up the being a servant to a higher power (not necceassrily a deity) better than previous attempts, though I liked the one in Dragon Magazine a lot. -- Let's go Brandon!