Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!paganini.bofh.team!not-for-mail From: Sten deJoode Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.mobile.ipad Subject: Re: Are iPhones subject to ransomware attacks? Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 01:20:41 -0500 Organization: To protect and to server Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 06:20:41 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: paganini.bofh.team; logging-data="1270902"; posting-host="nX6NL+i/zKLF2rH2RcunOw.user.paganini.bofh.team"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@bofh.team"; posting-account="9dIQLXBM7WM9KzA+yjdR4A"; User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.41 (Beta 38) Cancel-Lock: sha256:mjF08vTk2P4LNf/tgqJLH5Cjf7qUhe8qa7thAjDOs0U= X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.3 Bytes: 2462 Lines: 26 On 17 Mar 2024 23:16:58 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote: >> No Jolly Roger. You're dead wrong. > > Nope, I'm right. Without a single cite, you declared that there are no zero-click zero-days in Apple products, & yet, scores of reliable cites show you are wrong, JR. The reason you're wrong isn't so much your IQ is no higher than about 50. It's because you're a religious nut case that can't fathom that Apple has ten times the number of exploits than Android for five years in a row. Apple NEVER tells the truth about their products, Jolly Roger. Yet that's all you read. Apple marketing literature. You've never read the news about Apple products in your life, JR. For example: