Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Justisaur Newsgroups: rec.games.frp.dnd Subject: Re: OneDnD seems to mainstream psionics Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 14:43:14 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 34 Message-ID: References: <7ivk2j560cru7gbb1eb1gl0drn76k2pg6b@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 23:43:15 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0e9e7526e2e9c98542a8b3fab4d33a5d"; logging-data="3395217"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19WFxNWaoq8LMes7K6Odc6CdfJFfjr8z2Q=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:P+0sOoPAF6KrsAb+jM0YLqfzSVA= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 2259 On 4/25/2024 10:57 AM, Kyonshi wrote: > On 4/25/2024 6:16 PM, Spalls Hurgenson wrote: > > Don't forget warlocks, which didn't use to be a thing but now are. On > the other hand it sounds as if those they want to have are just > variations on fighters and thieves instead of proper psions. Warlocks and Sorcerers were both added in 3.5e I liked the iterations in that edition much better. They both feel like they should be sub-classes and in optional books. Do you really need 3 charisma based arcane full caster base classes in the PHB? Heck there's only 2 full physical classes. As much as I love psionics, I'd prefer it also in another optional book as they're loading too much into the PHB already. (I actually > think the word psion is kind of cool, and it's a pity it now sounds like > a piece of antiquated telecommunications technology) It sounds the same as my old car - a Scion. I'll play a Psion xB, he's a bit boxy, but gets you around town with the kids. :) -- -Justisaur ø-ø (\_/)\ `-'\ `--.___, ¶¬'\( ,_.-' \\ ^'